CVE-2026-32711

CVE-2026-32711 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in pydicom (pip), affecting versions >= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.1. It is fixed in 3.0.2, 2.4.5.

Summary

A crafted DICOMDIR can set ReferencedFileID to a path outside the File-set root. pydicom resolves the path only to confirm that it exists, but does not verify that the resolved path remains under the File-set root. Subsequent public FileSet operations such as copy(), write(), and remove()+write(use_existing=True) use that unchecked path in file I/O operations. This allows arbitrary file read/copy and, in some flows, move/delete outside the File-set root.

Details

Verified on pydicom 3.1.0.dev0.

Relevant logic is in src/pydicom/fileset.py:

  • RecordNode._file_id converts ReferencedFileID directly to Path(...)
  • FileSet.load() checks only (root / file_id).resolve(strict=True) to confirm existence
  • FileSet.load() does not verify that the final resolved path is contained within the File-set root
  • FileInstance.path returns self.file_set.path / self.node._file_id
  • FileSet.copy() uses shutil.copyfile(instance.path, dst)
  • FileSet.write() uses Path(instance.path).unlink() and shutil.move(...)

Because there is no containment check such as resolved.relative_to(root.resolve(strict=True)), a malicious DICOMDIR can reference:

  • absolute paths such as /etc/passwd
  • traversal paths such as ../...
  • syntactically conformant file IDs that escape via symlinks

This is not limited to obviously invalid VR input. Even when pydicom emits warnings for invalid ReferencedFileID values, the operation is not blocked. I also confirmed a symlink-based variant using a conformant file ID.

A realistic server-side scenario is:

  1. a user uploads a DICOM File-set zip
  2. the server loads the uploaded DICOMDIR using FileSet
  3. the server re-exports or reorganizes the File-set using FileSet.copy() or FileSet.write()
  4. a server-local file referenced by the malicious DICOMDIR is included in the exported result

PoC

Minimal reproduction:

  1. Copy a sample File-set that contains a valid DICOMDIR
  2. Modify one DirectoryRecordSequence item so that ReferencedFileID = "/etc/passwd" (or /tmp/secret.txt)
  3. Load it with FileSet(ds) or FileSet(path_to_dicomdir)
  4. Call FileSet.copy(new_root)
  5. Observe that the exported File-set contains the contents of the referenced external file

Example:

from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import mkdtemp
import shutil
from pydicom import dcmread
from pydicom.fileset import FileSet

base = Path("src/pydicom/data/test_files/dicomdirtests")
root = Path(mkdtemp(prefix="fsroot_"))
out = Path(mkdtemp(prefix="fsout_"))

shutil.copy2(base / "DICOMDIR", root / "DICOMDIR")
for d in ("77654033", "98892003", "98892001"):
    shutil.copytree(base / d, root / d)

ds = dcmread(root / "DICOMDIR")
item = next(x for x in ds.DirectoryRecordSequence if "ReferencedFileID" in x)
item.ReferencedFileID = "/etc/passwd"

fs = FileSet(ds)
fs.copy(out)

I also verified the issue in a simple web import/export demo where an uploaded malicious File-set caused /etc/passwd to be copied into the exported result.

If useful, I can provide the exact malicious sample and the demo environment separately.

Impact

This is a path traversal / root containment bypass in FileSet handling.

Observed impact:

arbitrary file read/copy outside the File-set root via FileSet.copy()
arbitrary file move outside the File-set root via FileSet.write()
arbitrary file delete outside the File-set root via FileSet.remove(...); write(use_existing=True)
Affected applications are those that accept untrusted DICOMDIR / File-set input and then call public FileSet workflows such as load(), copy(), write(), or remove().

A realistic impact is server-side file disclosure in import/export workflows.

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

CVE-2026-32711 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.0.2, 2.4.5); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

pydicom (>= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.1) pydicom (< 2.4.5)

Security releases

pydicom → 3.0.2 (pip) pydicom → 2.4.5 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

pydicom to 3.0.2 or later; pydicom to 2.4.5 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-32711? CVE-2026-32711 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in pydicom (pip), affecting versions >= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.1. It is fixed in 3.0.2, 2.4.5. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-32711? CVE-2026-32711 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of pydicom are affected by CVE-2026-32711? pydicom (pip) versions >= 3.0.0, <= 3.0.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-32711? Yes. CVE-2026-32711 is fixed in 3.0.2, 2.4.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-32711 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-32711 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-32711 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-32711?
    • Upgrade pydicom to 3.0.2 or later
    • Upgrade pydicom to 2.4.5 or later

Other vulnerabilities in pydicom

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.