CVE-2026-33682

CVE-2026-33682 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Streamlit (pip), affecting versions < 1.54.0. It is fixed in 1.54.0.

Summary

Streamlit Open Source Security Advisory

1. Impacted Products

Streamlit Open Source versions prior to 1.54.0 running on Windows hosts.

2. Introduction

Snowflake Streamlit Open Source addressed a security vulnerability affecting Windows deployments related to improper handling and validation of filesystem paths within component request handling. The vulnerability was reported through the responsible disclosure program and has been remediated in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0. This issue affects only Streamlit deployments running on Windows operating systems.

3. Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and NTLM Credential Exposure

3.1 Description

Streamlit was informed by a security researcher of an unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of attacker-supplied filesystem paths. In certain code paths, including within the ComponentRequestHandler, filesystem paths are resolved using os.path.realpath() or Path.resolve() before sufficient validation occurs.

On Windows systems, supplying a malicious UNC path (e.g., \\attacker-controlled-host\share) can cause the Streamlit server to initiate outbound SMB connections over port 445. When Windows attempts to authenticate to the remote SMB server, NTLMv2 challenge-response credentials of the Windows user running the Streamlit process may be transmitted.

This behavior may allow an attacker to:

  • Perform NTLM relay attacks against other internal services
  • Identify internally reachable SMB hosts via timing analysis

Note: The issue is unauthenticated and does not require user interaction.

Captured NTLMv2 challenge-response hashes could be subjected to offline brute-force attacks in an attempt to recover the associated plaintext account password. While NTLMv2 incorporates a server challenge (nonce) that mitigates the use of precomputed rainbow tables, it does not prevent targeted offline password cracking against weak credentials.

Additionally, Microsoft has publicly discouraged the continued use of NTLM in favor of Kerberos and is actively progressing toward disabling NTLM by default in future Windows releases. Organizations that enforce NTLM restrictions, disable outbound NTLM authentication, require SMB signing, or block NTLM authentication to remote servers can reduce or eliminate the risk associated with credential relay or hash exposure scenarios.

As NTLM is considered legacy and increasingly deprecated (though not fully sunset), environments that have already implemented Microsoft-recommended NTLM hardening controls are less likely to be materially impacted. The overall risk therefore depends on the organization's authentication configuration and network security posture.

3.2 Scenarios and Attack Vectors

Streamlit applications running on Windows were vulnerable if component endpoints were exposed to untrusted networks. By appending an attacker-controlled SMB hostname to the URI path and issuing a GET request, the Streamlit server could be coerced into initiating an outbound SMB authentication attempt.

This could result in the leakage of NTLMv2 credential hashes for the Windows account running the Streamlit process.

3.3 Resolution

  • The vulnerability has been fixed in Streamlit Open Source version 1.54.0.
  • It is recommended that all Streamlit deployments on Windows be upgraded immediately to version 1.54.0 or later.

4. Contact

Please contact [email protected] for any questions regarding this advisory.

If a security vulnerability is discovered in a Streamlit product or website, it should be reported through the responsible disclosure program. For more information, see the Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.

Impact

Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.

CVE-2026-33682 has a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium). The vector is reachable from an adjacent network, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.54.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

Streamlit (< 1.54.0)

Security releases

Streamlit → 1.54.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Upgrade Streamlit to 1.54.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-33682? CVE-2026-33682 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Streamlit (pip), affecting versions < 1.54.0. It is fixed in 1.54.0. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-33682? CVE-2026-33682 has a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of Streamlit are affected by CVE-2026-33682? Streamlit (pip) versions < 1.54.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-33682? Yes. CVE-2026-33682 is fixed in 1.54.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-33682 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-33682 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-33682 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-33682? Upgrade Streamlit to 1.54.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in Streamlit

CVE-2024-42474CVE-2023-27494CVE-2022-35918

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.