Summary
CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data
A logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction's txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. To be clear, this would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes.
Severity
High - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.
Affected Versions
All Zebra versions supporting V5 transactions (Network Upgrade 5 and later) prior to version 4.3.0.
Description
The vulnerability exists in the find_verified_unmined_tx function within transaction.rs. This function was designed to optimize block verification by checking if a transaction was already verified in the mempool.
The lookup mechanism used the ZIP-244 txid as the unique key. However, for V5 transactions, the txid specifically excludes the Authorization Data Root (signatures and proofs). Because Zebra returned a "verified" status based solely on the txid, it skipped the essential check_v5_auth() call for the transaction version provided in the block.
An attacker (specifically a malicious miner) could exploit this by:
- Observing a valid V5 transaction broadcast to the network and entering a Zebra node's mempool.
- Creating a block containing a modified version of that transaction. The modified version has the same
txidbut contains invalid signatures or proofs. - The affected Zebra node identifies the
txidin its mempool and incorrectly assumes the block's version of the transaction is already verified. - The node commits the block with the invalid transaction data.
- Other nodes (like
zcashdorzebranodes without that transaction in their mempool) reject the block, resulting in a chain fork where the poisoned Zebra node is isolated.
Fixed Versions
This issue is fixed in Zebra 4.3.0.
The fix ensures that verification is only skipped if the transaction's full integrity, including authorization data, is validated against the mempool entry.
Mitigation
Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.3.0 or later immediately.
There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to ensure the node remains on the correct consensus path and is protected against malicious chain forks.
Resources
Impact
Consensus Failure
- Attack Vector: Network (specifically via a malicious miner).
- Effect: Network partition/consensus split.
- Scope: Any Zebra node utilizing the transaction verification cache optimization for V5 transactions.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
zebrad to 4.3.0 or later; zebra-consensus to 5.0.1 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-34377? CVE-2026-34377 is a high-severity security vulnerability in zebrad (rust), affecting versions < 4.3.0. It is fixed in 4.3.0, 5.0.1.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-34377?
zebrad(rust) (versions < 4.3.0)zebra-consensus(rust) (versions < 5.0.1)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-34377? Yes. CVE-2026-34377 is fixed in 4.3.0, 5.0.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-34377 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-34377 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-34377 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-34377?
- Upgrade
zebradto 4.3.0 or later - Upgrade
zebra-consensusto 5.0.1 or later
- Upgrade