CVE-2026-53723

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with a strict enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>, or avoid serializing untrusted data into location: xml element text until patched. Where appropriate for the service schema, XML attributes are not affected because they are written with XMLWriter attribute APIs rather than CDATA sections.

To determine whether action is needed, search service descriptions for request parameters using location: xml, including operation parameters and additionalParameters. Response-only models are not directly affected unless parsed values are reused for request serialization. For object and array parameters, review nested scalar properties because leaf element values can still be affected.

References

• https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#sec-cdata-sect
• https://www.php.net/manual/en/xmlwriter.writecdata.php
• https://www.php.net/manual/en/xmlwriter.text.php

guzzlehttp/guzzle-services does not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator ]]>. The XML request serializer writes values containing <, >, or & with XMLWriter::writeCData($value). If attacker-controlled input contains ]]>, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema.

Users are affected when all of the following are true:

1. The application uses guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to serialize outgoing requests.
2. A request parameter or additionalParameters schema uses location: xml.
3. The value is serialized as XML element text, not an XML attribute.
4. The value can contain attacker-controlled, user-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted input.
5. The value is not constrained by a safe enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>.
6. The downstream service parses the generated XML structurally and may act on unexpected, duplicated, or injected elements.

Applications that serialize untrusted input into location: xml request parameters can emit XML containing attacker-controlled elements outside the intended text node. Depending on the receiving service, this can alter operation semantics, smuggle privileged fields, bypass modeled parameter boundaries, or create conflicting duplicated elements. Fixed service descriptions are sufficient if they contain an XML element parameter populated from attacker-controlled input.

Users are not directly affected if they only use Guzzle Services to deserialize HTTP response bodies. Response XML parsing uses the response XML location visitor and does not invoke the vulnerable request XML serializer. Response bodies matter only in a second-order flow, such as parsing attacker-controlled response XML, storing or forwarding a parsed string value, and later using it as a location: xml request parameter.

Example fixed service description:

'DisplayName' => ['location' => 'xml', 'type' => 'string']

If an attacker-controlled display name is:

Alice]]></DisplayName><Role>admin</Role><DisplayName><![CDATA[

the vulnerable serializer can emit an injected element outside the intended DisplayName text node:

<Request><DisplayName><![CDATA[Alice]]></DisplayName><Role>admin</Role><DisplayName><![CDATA[]]></DisplayName></Request>

If the downstream service treats <Role> as meaningful, the attacker has set a field the modeled DisplayName parameter was not intended to set.

The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths. Typical impact: varies by context: data corruption, logic bypass, or denial of service.

CVE-2026-53723 has a CVSS score of 5.8 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.5.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

The issue is patched in 1.5.4 and later by safely splitting embedded CDATA terminators before serialization. The fix preserves the original scalar value as XML text and prevents injected nodes.

1. What is CVE-2026-53723? CVE-2026-53723 is a medium-severity improper input validation vulnerability in guzzlehttp/guzzle-services (composer), affecting versions < 1.5.4. It is fixed in 1.5.4. The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-53723? CVE-2026-53723 has a CVSS score of 5.8 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of guzzlehttp/guzzle-services are affected by CVE-2026-53723? guzzlehttp/guzzle-services (composer) versions < 1.5.4 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-53723? Yes. CVE-2026-53723 is fixed in 1.5.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-53723 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-53723 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-53723 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-53723? Upgrade guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to 1.5.4 or later.