GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately on an affected host:

• Run nuxt dev inside a container or VM with no other tenants. Docker already triggers the filesystem-socket fallback in vulnerable versions and that fallback is unaffected.
• Bind the dev process to a single-user namespace (unshare -U, rootless containers).
• Restrict /proc/net/unix visibility via hidepid=2 mount options where applicable, though this is partial mitigation only.

References

• Affected file: packages/vite/src/plugins/vite-node.ts
• CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions

Credit

Reported by Anthropic / Claude as part of Anthropic's coordinated vulnerability disclosure programme, reference ANT-2026-MSNKZFAT. Thanks to the Anthropic security team for the report and the detailed reproduction.

Independently reported by @alcls01111 via GitHub's coordinated disclosure flow (GHSA-5gvc-46gq-948j), closed as a duplicate of this advisory.

When running nuxt dev on Linux (Node.js 20+, outside Docker / StackBlitz), Nuxt's internal vite-node IPC server binds to a Linux abstract-namespace Unix socket (\0nuxt-vite-node-<pid>-<ts>.sock). Abstract sockets have no filesystem inode and therefore no permission bits: any local UID on the host that can read /proc/net/unix can enumerate the socket and connect to it.

The IPC server does not perform any peer-credential or shared-secret check before dispatching requests. The module request type passes its moduleId field straight into Vite's SSR fetchModule(), which is not gated by Vite's HTTP-layer server.fs.allow deny-list. A co-resident unprivileged local user can therefore request paths like /home/<dev>/project/.env?raw or ~/.ssh/id_rsa?raw and read the developer's secrets through the dev server's SSR plugin pipeline. The resolve request type additionally enables filesystem probing.

This affects developers running nuxt dev on shared multi-tenant Linux hosts (lab machines, shared bastions, CI runners shared between jobs without per-job container isolation). It does not affect:

• Production builds (nuxt build / nuxt start). The IPC server only runs in development.
• macOS or Windows developers.
• Docker / StackBlitz environments, which already fall back to a filesystem socket.
• Single-user laptops or per-job containerised CI.

GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.4.7, 3.21.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

Fixed in [email protected] (commit 1f9f4767) and backported to [email protected] (commit c293bf95).

The fix removes the abstract-namespace branch entirely. The IPC server now always binds to a filesystem Unix socket under the OS temp directory and explicitly chmod 0600s it after listen(), restricting connections to the owning UID. If the chmod fails for any reason, the server closes rather than serve requests on an unrestricted channel.

1. What is GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9? GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in nuxt (npm), affecting versions >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.7. It is fixed in 4.4.7, 3.21.7.
2. How severe is GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9? GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of nuxt are affected by GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9? nuxt (npm) versions >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.7 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9? Yes. GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 is fixed in 4.4.7, 3.21.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix GHSA-534H-C3CW-V3H9?
   • Upgrade nuxt to 4.4.7 or later
   • Upgrade nuxt to 3.21.7 or later