GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J

Type: Authorization-bypass via user-controlled identifier. The Meet plugin's recorded-video upload endpoint (plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php) authenticates the caller using a single shared Authorization: Bearer <secret> against $objM->secret. Once that check passes, the endpoint reads the target user identifier from the uploaded file's name field, instantiates a User object with that ID, and calls $userObject->login(true, true), the no-password / encoded-password login path, committing a session for that user and emitting Set-Cookie headers to the caller. There is no check that the caller actually owns the requested users_id.
File: plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php, lines 56-65; secondary in objects/user.php User::login() (no-password branch at lines 1276-1310).
Root cause: the upload handler's identity model is "service-to-service" (a Meet/Jitsi recorder posts a finished recording back to AVideo with the shared secret) but the users_id to credit the upload to is parsed from the FILENAME the same caller controls, $users_id = explode('-', $_FILES['upl']['name'])[0];. There is no signed claim, no separate proof-of-identity, no allowlist. The subsequent $userObject->login(true, true) call invokes the no-password login path which sets $_SESSION['user'], calls setUserCookie(...), and _session_regenerate_id(), exactly the operations a normal login performs. The response carries the new PHPSESSID back to the caller, who can then reuse it on every subsequent request to act as the targeted user. The Meet shared secret is md5($global['systemRootPath'] . $global['salt'] . "meet") (Meet.php:73), so any attacker who can read videos/configuration.php (e.g., via a path-traversal CVE such as GHSA-83xq-8jxj-4rxm or GHSA-4wmm-6qxj-fpj4 that the project has already addressed in this surface area) can compute the Meet secret deterministically and pivot to full account takeover.

Affected Code

File: plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php, lines 33-73.

if (empty($token)) {
    forbiddenPage('Token not found');
}

$objM = AVideoPlugin::getObjectDataIfEnabled("Meet");
if (empty($objM)) {
    forbiddenPage('Plugin disabled');
}

if ($objM->secret != $token) {                              // <-- shared-secret auth, no per-user proof
    forbiddenPage('Token does not match');
}

if (empty($_FILES['upl'])) {
    forbiddenPage('videoFile not found');
}

$users_id = explode('-', $_FILES['upl']['name'])[0];        // <-- BUG: target users_id parsed from attacker-controlled filename

$userObject = new User($users_id);
$userObject->login(true, true);                             // <-- BUG: passwordless login as the chosen user; sets $_SESSION + Set-Cookie
$tmpFile = getTmpDir() . uniqid();

if (move_uploaded_file($_FILES['upl']['tmp_name'], $tmpFile)) {
    $_FILES['upl']['tmp_name'] = $tmpFile;
    require $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/aVideoQueueEncoder.json.php';
}

File: objects/user.php, lines 1249-1329 (User::login() no-password branch).

public function login($noPass = false, $encodedPass = false, $ignoreEmailVerification = false)
{
    // ...
    if ($noPass) {
        $user = $this->find($this->user, false, true);      // <-- no password check
    }
    // ...
    } elseif ($user) {
        $_SESSION['user'] = $user;                          // <-- session set for the impersonated user
        $this->setLastLogin($_SESSION['user']['id']);
        // ...
        self::setUserCookie($rememberme, $user['id'], $user['user'], $passhash, $expires);
        AVideoPlugin::onUserSignIn($_SESSION['user']['id']);
        $_SESSION['loginAttempts'] = 0;
        _session_regenerate_id();                           // <-- new SID committed in Set-Cookie response
        _session_write_close();
        return self::USER_LOGGED;
    }
}

Why it's wrong: the endpoint conflates two distinct authentication concerns. The shared-secret check answers "is this request coming from a trusted Meet recorder?" but the filename parse answers "which user does this recording belong to?", and the second answer is taken from the same untrusted caller. Once User->login(true, true) runs, the server has no way to distinguish a legitimate Meet integration from an attacker who happens to know the same secret. The decision to expose this as a session (cookie + _session_regenerate_id) rather than as a one-shot in-process credit makes the impact larger than it needs to be: even if the Meet integration only needed to credit the recording to a user, the implementation gives the caller a fully-authenticated session as that user.

Exploit Chain

1. Attacker obtains the Meet shared secret. Two plausible paths:
   • Path A (computational): the secret is md5($global['systemRootPath'] . $global['salt'] . "meet") (plugin/Meet/Meet.php:73). Both inputs sit in videos/configuration.php. AVideo's history of LFI/path-traversal CVEs in this surface (e.g., the import.json.php and listFiles.json.php advisories already accepted on this program) means the salt is a realistic disclosure target.
   • Path B (timing oracle): plugin/Meet/checkToken.json.php line 26 does if ($objM->secret === $_GET['secret']) with no constant-time comparison and a clear yes/no response body. PHP's === for strings short-circuits on first byte mismatch, so an attacker on the same network segment can recover the 32-hex secret byte-by-byte over the network with timing analysis. Slower than path A but doesn't depend on a separate vulnerability.
2. Attacker prepares an HTTP POST to /plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php:
   • Authorization: Bearer <Meet secret>
   • Multipart body with one file field named upl. The filename is set to 1-anything.mp4 (where 1 is the users_id of the admin or any target user, the format is <users_id>-<arbitrary>). The file body itself can be anything that survives the surrounding aVideoQueueEncoder pipeline (an empty file is enough to reach the login call before the encoder rejects).
3. Server flow:
   • Line 33: token present, ok.
   • Line 46: $objM->secret != $token → false (matches), passes.
   • Line 51: $_FILES['upl'] present, ok.
   • Line 56: $users_id = explode('-', '1-anything.mp4')[0] → '1'.
   • Line 59-60: $userObject = new User(1); $userObject->login(true, true);, passwordless login as user 1 (admin). $_SESSION['user'] is set, setUserCookie runs, _session_regenerate_id issues a new session ID, and the response carries Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=<new-sid>; ....
   • Subsequent code runs the encoder pipeline as admin, but the attacker's primary goal was already achieved when the session was established.
4. Attacker captures the Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=... header from the response and uses that cookie on all subsequent requests. Server treats them as user 1 (admin), full UI access, all admin endpoints, all video management, plugin configuration, user impersonation, etc.
5. Final state: admin account takeover. The original Meet recorder's flow (legitimate uploads with users_id = the user who scheduled the meeting) is indistinguishable on the wire from the attack flow (users_id = whoever the attacker wants to be).

Security Impact

Severity: sec-high. End state is full account takeover of any user (including admin), reachable from a single HTTP POST once the secret is known. The shared-secret precondition raises AC to High but does not eliminate it as a credible threat, the secret is computable from any leak of videos/configuration.php, and AVideo's CVE history in that surface area is non-trivial.
Attacker capability: session hijack as any users_id the attacker cares to name. The attacker chooses the target by setting the filename's leading digits before the first -. No bound on which user IDs are reachable; admin (1 on a default install) is the obvious target. Once the session is captured, the attacker has full admin UI/API access for the session lifetime (hours-to-days depending on rememberme flag).
Preconditions: Meet plugin enabled (default-off but commonly enabled by deployments using AVideo for video-conferencing recording). Knowledge of the Meet shared secret (computable from the salt; obtainable via timing attack on checkToken.json.php).
Differential: source-inspection-verified end-to-end. The two relevant code blocks are quoted verbatim in §Affected Code; both lines are reachable on every successful POST to the endpoint. The patched build (with the suggested fix below) either rejects the upload as 'cannot derive identity from filename' or constrains the users_id to one bound by an additional signed claim from the Meet recorder.

The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access. Typical impact: unauthorized access to functions or data reserved for authenticated parties.

GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Kodem intelligence

Three changes, in order of importance:

--- a/plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php
+++ b/plugin/Meet/uploadRecordedVideo.json.php
@@ -53,17 +53,28 @@ if (empty($_FILES['upl'])) {
     forbiddenPage('videoFile not found');
 }

-$users_id = explode('-', $_FILES['upl']['name'])[0];
+// The users_id MUST come from a signed claim (e.g., a JWT issued by AVideo
+// when the meeting was scheduled), not from a filename the caller controls.
+// Verify a recording-upload token here that was minted at meeting-create
+// time and bound to (meet_schedule_id, users_id) with an HMAC.
+$claim = MeetUploadClaim::verifyFromHeaders($headers);
+if (!$claim) {
+    forbiddenPage('Missing or invalid recording upload claim');
+}
+$users_id = (int) $claim->users_id;
+if (!$users_id || !User::idExists($users_id)) {
+    forbiddenPage('Recording upload claim references unknown user');
+}

-$userObject = new User($users_id);
-$userObject->login(true, true);
+// Credit the upload to $users_id WITHOUT establishing a session. The encoder
+// pipeline can be parameterised to record ownership directly; there is no
+// reason for a service-to-service upload endpoint to mint a user session.
+$queueOwnerUsersId = $users_id;
 $tmpFile = getTmpDir() . uniqid();

 if (move_uploaded_file($_FILES['upl']['tmp_name'], $tmpFile)) {
     $_FILES['upl']['tmp_name'] = $tmpFile;
-    require $global['systemRootPath'] . 'objects/aVideoQueueEncoder.json.php';
+    aVideoQueueEncoder::encodeOnBehalfOf($queueOwnerUsersId, $_FILES['upl']);
 }

Additionally:

1. Use hash_equals for the secret comparison in both this endpoint and checkToken.json.php (if (!hash_equals($objM->secret, $token))). The current ==/=== is vulnerable to byte-by-byte timing analysis.
2. Remove checkToken.json.php entirely, or at least gate it behind User::isAdmin(). A network-reachable endpoint that confirms whether a guess matches the server-side secret is exactly the wrong shape for a high-value secret like this one.

Optional defense-in-depth (separate change): rotate the Meet secret to use a random 256-bit value (not derived from salt), so a videos/configuration.php disclosure does not also yield the Meet secret. Store the random secret as a per-deployment row in the Meet plugin's configuration table, generated at first-run.

Add a regression test: call uploadRecordedVideo.json.php with the correct secret but a filename of 1-x.mp4; assert the response does NOT include a Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID= header.

1. What is GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J? GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J is a high-severity improper authentication vulnerability in WWBN/AVideo (composer), affecting versions <= 29.0. No fixed version is listed yet. The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access.
2. How severe is GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J? GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of WWBN/AVideo are affected by GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J? WWBN/AVideo (composer) versions <= 29.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J? No fixed version is listed for GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
5. Is GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix GHSA-QXVM-R42F-5P8J? No fixed version is listed yet. In the interim: Keep the dependency up to date. Ensure authentication checks are present and cannot be bypassed by manipulating request parameters.