Summary
Vulnerability Description
Vulnerability Overview
- The
/api/v1/attachments/:chatflowId/:chatIdendpoint is listed inWHITELIST_URLS, allowing unauthenticated access to the file upload API. - While the server validates uploads based on the MIME types defined in
chatbotConfig.fullFileUpload.allowedUploadFileTypes, it implicitly trusts the client-providedContent-Typeheader (file.mimetype) without verifying the file's actual content (magic bytes) or extension (file.originalname). - Consequently, an attacker can bypass this restriction by spoofing the
Content-Typeas a permitted type (e.g.,application/pdf) while uploading malicious scripts or arbitrary files. Once uploaded viaaddArrayFilesToStorage, these files persist in backend storage (S3, GCS, or local disk). This vulnerability serves as a critical entry point that, when chained with other features like static hosting or file retrieval, can lead to Stored XSS, malicious file hosting, or Remote Code Execution (RCE).
Vulnerable Code
Upload Route Definition
// CREATE router.post('/:chatflowId/:chatId', getMulterStorage().array('files'), attachmentsController.createAttachment) export default routerMount /api/v1/attachments to the global router
const router = express.Router() router.use('/ping', pingRouter) router.use('/apikey', apikeyRouter) router.use('/assistants', assistantsRouter) router.use('/attachments', attachmentsRouter)Include /api/v1/attachments in the WHITELIST_URLS list
export const WHITELIST_URLS = [ '/api/v1/verify/apikey/', '/api/v1/chatflows/apikey/', '/api/v1/public-chatflows', '/api/v1/public-chatbotConfig', '/api/v1/public-executions', '/api/v1/prediction/', '/api/v1/vector/upsert/', '/api/v1/node-icon/', '/api/v1/components-credentials-icon/', '/api/v1/chatflows-streaming', '/api/v1/chatflows-uploads', '/api/v1/openai-assistants-file/download', '/api/v1/feedback', '/api/v1/leads', '/api/v1/get-upload-file', '/api/v1/ip', '/api/v1/ping', '/api/v1/version', '/api/v1/attachments', '/api/v1/metrics',Bypass JWT validation if the URL is whitelisted
const denylistURLs = process.env.DENYLIST_URLS ? process.env.DENYLIST_URLS.split(',') : [] const whitelistURLs = WHITELIST_URLS.filter((url) => !denylistURLs.includes(url)) const URL_CASE_INSENSITIVE_REGEX: RegExp = /\/api\/v1\//i const URL_CASE_SENSITIVE_REGEX: RegExp = /\/api\/v1\// await initializeJwtCookieMiddleware(this.app, this.identityManager) this.app.use(async (req, res, next) => { // Step 1: Check if the req path contains /api/v1 regardless of case if (URL_CASE_INSENSITIVE_REGEX.test(req.path)) { // Step 2: Check if the req path is casesensitive if (URL_CASE_SENSITIVE_REGEX.test(req.path)) { // Step 3: Check if the req path is in the whitelist const isWhitelisted = whitelistURLs.some((url) => req.path.startsWith(url)) if (isWhitelisted) { next()Multer Configuration: Saves files without file type validation
export const getUploadPath = (): string => { return process.env.BLOB_STORAGE_PATH ? path.join(process.env.BLOB_STORAGE_PATH, 'uploads') : path.join(getUserHome(), '.flowise', 'uploads') } export function generateId() { return uuidv4() } export const getMulterStorage = () => { const storageType = process.env.STORAGE_TYPE ? process.env.STORAGE_TYPE : 'local' if (storageType === 's3') { const s3Client = getS3Config().s3Client const Bucket = getS3Config().Bucket const upload = multer({ storage: multerS3({ s3: s3Client, bucket: Bucket, metadata: function (req, file, cb) { cb(null, { fieldName: file.fieldname, originalName: file.originalname }) }, key: function (req, file, cb) { cb(null, `${generateId()}`) } }) }) return upload } else if (storageType === 'gcs') { return multer({ storage: new MulterGoogleCloudStorage({ projectId: process.env.GOOGLE_CLOUD_STORAGE_PROJ_ID, bucket: process.env.GOOGLE_CLOUD_STORAGE_BUCKET_NAME, keyFilename: process.env.GOOGLE_CLOUD_STORAGE_CREDENTIAL, uniformBucketLevelAccess: Boolean(process.env.GOOGLE_CLOUD_UNIFORM_BUCKET_ACCESS) ?? true, destination: `uploads/${generateId()}` }) }) } else { return multer({ dest: getUploadPath() }) } }Transfers uploaded files to storage without verification
const files = (req.files as Express.Multer.File[]) || [] const fileAttachments = [] if (files.length) { const isBase64 = req.body.base64 for (const file of files) { if (!allowedFileTypes.length) { throw new InternalFlowiseError( StatusCodes.BAD_REQUEST, `File type '${file.mimetype}' is not allowed. Allowed types: ${allowedFileTypes.join(', ')}` ) } // Validate file type against allowed types if (allowedFileTypes.length > 0 && !allowedFileTypes.includes(file.mimetype)) { throw new InternalFlowiseError( StatusCodes.BAD_REQUEST, `File type '${file.mimetype}' is not allowed. Allowed types: ${allowedFileTypes.join(', ')}` ) } await checkStorage(orgId, subscriptionId, appServer.usageCacheManager) const fileBuffer = await getFileFromUpload(file.path ?? file.key) const fileNames: string[] = [] // Address file name with special characters: https://github.com/expressjs/multer/issues/1104 file.originalname = Buffer.from(file.originalname, 'latin1').toString('utf8') const { path: storagePath, totalSize } = await addArrayFilesToStorage( file.mimetype, fileBuffer, file.originalname, fileNames, orgId, chatflowid, chatId )
PoC
PoC Description
- Create a local file named
shell.jscontaining arbitrary JavaScript code (or a malicious payload). - Send a
multipart/form-datarequest to the/api/v1/attachments/891f64a2-a26f-4169-b333-905dc96c200a/:chatIdendpoint without any authentication (login, session, or API keys). - During the upload, retain the filename as
shell.jsbut spoof theContent-Typeheader asapplication/pdf. - This exploits the server's reliance solely on the client-provided
file.mimetype, forcing it to process the malicious JS file as an allowed PDF, thereby confirming unauthenticated arbitrary file upload.
PoC
curl -X POST \
"http://localhost:3000/api/v1/attachments/891f64a2-a26f-4169-b333-905dc96c200a/$(uuidgen)" \
-F "[email protected];type=application/pdf"
Impact
1. Root Cause
The vulnerability stems from relying solely on the MIME type without cross-validating the file extension or actual content. This allows attackers to upload executable files (e.g., .js, .php) or malicious scripts (.html) by masquerading them as benign images or documents.
2. Key Attack Scenarios
- Server Compromise (RCE): An attacker uploads a Web Shell and triggers its execution on the server. Successful exploitation grants system privileges, allowing unauthorized access to internal data and full control over the server.
- Client-Side Attack (Stored XSS): An attacker uploads files containing malicious scripts (e.g., HTML, SVG). When a victim views the file, the script executes within their browser, leading to session cookie theft and account takeover.
3. Impact
This vulnerability is rated as High severity. The risk is particularly critical if the system utilizes shared storage (e.g., S3, GCS) or static hosting features, as the compromise could spread to the entire infrastructure and affect other tenants.
The application accepts file uploads without adequately restricting the file type or content. Typical impact: remote code execution if the uploaded file can be served and executed on the server.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-30821? CVE-2026-30821 is a high-severity unrestricted upload of dangerous file types vulnerability in flowise (npm), affecting versions <= 3.0.12. It is fixed in 3.0.13. The application accepts file uploads without adequately restricting the file type or content.
- Which versions of flowise are affected by CVE-2026-30821? flowise (npm) versions <= 3.0.12 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-30821? Yes. CVE-2026-30821 is fixed in 3.0.13. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-30821 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-30821 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-30821 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-30821? Upgrade
flowiseto 3.0.13 or later.