CVE-2026-48152

Budibase stores external REST datasource credentials server-side and documents that database credentials are applied server-side and are not exposed in the UI. The REST datasource implementation redacts stored Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 auth secrets before returning datasource data to clients. However, the single-datasource GET and PUT routes are guarded by generic TABLE READ, not by Builder/Admin permission or datasource-specific ownership/resource checks.

The built-in Basic app user role maps to the WRITE permission set, which includes table read/write and query write. A Basic user can therefore read an existing REST datasource, receive redacted authConfigs values, submit an update that changes only config.url while keeping the redacted placeholders, and trigger an existing saved relative-path REST query. During update, mergeConfigs() restores the old stored secret when it sees the redaction placeholder. During query execution, Budibase prefixes the attacker-controlled datasource config.url to the relative query path and applies the resolved stored auth headers. The result is server-side disclosure of the builder-configured REST Authorization secret to an attacker-controlled listener.

Source evidence

• packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: datasource list/create/delete routes are on builderRoutes, but GET /api/datasources/:datasourceId and PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceId are in authorizedRoutes guarded only by PermissionType.TABLE and PermissionLevel.READ.
• packages/server/src/api/routes/datasource.ts: the :datasourceId routes do not attach datasource-specific resource authorization.
• packages/backend-core/src/security/roles.ts: built-in Basic user maps to BuiltinPermissionID.WRITE.
• packages/backend-core/src/security/permissions.ts: WRITE grants READ/EXECUTE levels and includes QUERY WRITE and TABLE WRITE.
• packages/server/src/api/controllers/datasource.ts: datasourceController.update reads the stored datasource, merges ctx.request.body into it, writes the result back, and returns a redacted copy.
• packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts: removeSecrets() redacts REST Basic/Bearer/OAuth2 secrets to PASSWORD_REPLACEMENT.
• packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/datasources/datasources.ts: mergeConfigs() restores the old stored auth-secret field when the update body sends the redaction placeholder for the same auth config.
• packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: relative REST query paths are prefixed with datasource config.url.
• packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts: REST execution resolves the selected auth config and applies the resulting auth headers to the outbound request.
• packages/server/src/api/routes/query.ts: saved query execution POST /api/v2/queries/:queryId is guarded by QUERY WRITE, which the Basic role has through the WRITE permission set.

Reproduction outline

No production systems were tested. This is source-backed and has a local static verifier plus a proof helper for an already-running authorized instance.

1. Deploy a current Budibase instance.
2. As a builder/admin, create and publish an app.
3. As the builder/admin, create a REST datasource with:
   • config.url set to a benign legitimate API base URL.
   • a stored REST auth config containing a sentinel secret, such as a Bearer token BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL.
4. As the builder/admin, create a saved REST query that uses a relative path and that auth config.
5. Add a non-builder Basic app user.
6. As the Basic user, confirm negative controls:
   • Builder-only datasource list/create/preview routes are denied.
   • The user is not a builder/admin.
7. As the Basic user, call GET /api/datasources/{datasourceId}. The response returns the datasource and redacted auth placeholders, not the raw secret.
8. As the Basic user, call PUT /api/datasources/{datasourceId} with the same redacted datasource body but with config.url changed to an attacker-controlled HTTP listener.
9. As the Basic user, execute the saved query with POST /api/v2/queries/{queryId}.
10. Expected vulnerable result: the attacker listener receives the server-side REST request with the preserved stored Authorization material, even though the Basic user never knew the raw secret and should not be able to administer datasource credentials.

Local source verifier:

python3 docker-proofs/s60/verify_budibase_basic_user_datasource_source_path.py

Expected success line:

SOURCE_PATH_VERIFIED budibase_basic_user_datasource_rest_secret_exfil

Observed May 1, 2026:

• origin/master was 8e6bf89acf1f602f3334592c4c8cd14e79f5362a.
• Latest release was 3.37.2 from Apr 30, 2026.
• The source verifier passed and confirmed the route, role, redaction, merge, URL-prefixing, auth-header, and saved-query execution conditions.

Proof-assist helper:

python3 docker-proofs/s60/proof_budibase_basic_user_datasource_update_rest_secret_exfil.py \
  --base-url http://127.0.0.1:10000 \
  --app-id <published-app-id> \
  --datasource-id <rest-datasource-id> \
  --query-id <saved-relative-rest-query-id> \
  --cookie '<basic-user-session-cookie>' \
  --expected-secret BUDIBASE_REST_TOKEN_SENTINEL

The helper does not start, stop, or delete containers/resources. It targets an authorized already-running instance, rewrites only config.url, captures the outbound Authorization material, and restores the original datasource by default.

Remediation ideas

• Move GET/PUT /api/datasources/:datasourceId behind Builder/Admin datasource permissions, or add datasource-specific resource authorization.
• Do not allow non-builder app users to update datasource config, authConfigs, base URL, default headers, or plugin connection settings.
• Split non-sensitive datasource metadata reads from credential-bearing/admin datasource reads.
• Treat redaction placeholders as valid only in trusted builder/admin update flows.
• Consider rotating REST datasource auth secrets for affected deployments after patching.

Duplicate/nearby public issue notes

Public triage found known Budibase REST datasource SSRF and protected-endpoint auth-bypass CVEs, but no obvious public duplicate for this specific Basic app-user PUT /api/datasources/:id role-boundary issue combined with preserved REST authConfigs secret exfiltration through a changed datasource base URL.

This breaks the intended application-user versus builder/admin boundary for external REST datasource credentials. A Basic app user should be able to use published app functionality, but should not be able to administer datasource connection settings or extract builder-configured REST auth secrets. In a realistic internal-tool deployment, REST datasource auth configs often contain bearer tokens, API keys, Basic credentials, OAuth client secrets, service account tokens, or integration credentials for ticketing, CRM, ERP, security, and operational systems.

An attacker with only Basic app-user access to an app that uses an authenticated REST datasource can redirect future query traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint and collect the preserved server-side Authorization header. This is distinct from public REST datasource SSRF issues because the core impact is stored credential disclosure across the role boundary, and it works with an external attacker-controlled URL rather than depending on internal-network reachability.

The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.

CVE-2026-48152 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.39.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

1. What is CVE-2026-48152? CVE-2026-48152 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in @budibase/server (npm), affecting versions < 3.39.0. It is fixed in 3.39.0. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-48152? CVE-2026-48152 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of @budibase/server are affected by CVE-2026-48152? @budibase/server (npm) versions < 3.39.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-48152? Yes. CVE-2026-48152 is fixed in 3.39.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-48152 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-48152 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-48152 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-48152? Upgrade @budibase/server to 3.39.0 or later.