Summary
@actual-app/sync-server: Disabled OpenID users keep access through existing session tokens
In OpenID multi-user mode, disabling a user only blocks future OpenID login for that identity. Existing Actual session tokens for the disabled user remain valid, so the user can continue calling authenticated server endpoints after an administrator has disabled the account.
Details
The disabled-user check is present during OpenID login finalization. Existing users are only accepted when the matching row has enabled = 1, and a disabled row causes the OpenID grant to fail before a new session token is created.
// packages/sync-server/src/accounts/openid.ts:284-291
const { id: userIdFromDb, display_name: displayName } =
accountDb.first(
'SELECT id, display_name FROM users WHERE user_name = ? and enabled = 1',
[identity],
) || {};
if (userIdFromDb == null) {
throw new Error('openid-grant-failed');
}
The shared session validation path does not perform the same enabled-user check. It accepts any existing token row that has not expired, then returns the session object to every route protected by validateSessionMiddleware.
// packages/sync-server/src/util/validate-user.ts:10-41
export function validateSession(req: Request, res: Response) {
let { token } = req.body || {};
if (!token) {
token = req.headers['x-actual-token'];
}
const session = getSession(token);
...
return session;
}
This means account disablement and session authorization diverge:
OpenID login path: users.enabled must be 1
Existing session path: token exists and is not expired; users.enabled is not checked
The default token expiration setting is never, so this is not just a short race after disablement on default deployments.
// packages/sync-server/src/load-config.js:260-264
token_expiration: {
doc: 'Token expiration time.',
format: 'tokenExpiration',
default: 'never',
env: 'ACTUAL_TOKEN_EXPIRATION',
},
Admins can change a user's enabled state through the user update route, but that update does not delete the user's existing sessions. After the update, the old token still satisfies validateSession.
// packages/sync-server/src/app-admin.js:91-101
app.patch('/users', validateSessionMiddleware, async (req, res) => {
if (!isAdmin(res.locals.user_id)) {
...
}
const { id, userName, role, displayName, enabled } = req.body || {};
// packages/sync-server/src/services/user-service.ts:98-102
getAccountDb().mutate(
'UPDATE users SET user_name = ?, display_name = ?, enabled = ?, role = ? WHERE id = ?',
[userName, displayName, enabled, roleId, userId],
);
Authenticated server features then continue to trust that session. For example, the sync API installs validateSessionMiddleware for the whole router, so a disabled user can keep using any sync operation that their still-valid session and existing file ownership/access allow.
// packages/sync-server/src/app-sync.ts:37-39
const app = express();
app.use(validateSessionMiddleware);
app.use(errorMiddleware);
This is distinct from the previously published cross-user sync authorization issue: the attacker does not need to access another user's file ID. The bypass is that a disabled user's own session remains authorized after account disablement.
PoC
- Run an Actual Sync Server in OpenID multi-user mode with
@actual-app/sync-server26.5.0. Use the default token expiration setting, or any setting where the token has not expired yet. - Log in as a non-admin OpenID user and save the returned Actual session token.
- As an admin, disable that same user through
PATCH /admin/usersby sendingenabled: false. - Reuse the old token against a protected endpoint.
Example success check:
curl -s https://actual.example.com/account/validate \
-H 'X-Actual-Token: <disabled_user_existing_token>'
Expected result on the affected code path: the request is still treated as authenticated and returns the disabled user's account/session information instead of 401 or 403.
A sync-facing check uses the same session validation primitive:
curl -s https://actual.example.com/sync/list-user-files \
-H 'X-Actual-Token: <disabled_user_existing_token>'
Expected result on the affected code path: the disabled user can still list and operate on budget files that the stale session is otherwise allowed to access.
Impact
A disabled OpenID user can keep post-authentication access until the session row is deleted or expires. With the default token_expiration: never, this can persist indefinitely.
For a disabled basic user, the confirmed impact is continued access to that user's own budgets and any budgets shared with that user, including sensitive financial data and allowed mutations. For a disabled admin user, the impact is broader because the existing token can still satisfy admin role checks; that condition preserves administrative access after the account was disabled.
The missing rule is that session validation should reject disabled users, and disabling or deleting a user should revoke that user's existing sessions.
CVE-2026-49229 has a CVSS score of 8.3 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (26.6.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-49229? CVE-2026-49229 is a high-severity security vulnerability in @actual-app/sync-server (npm), affecting versions <= 26.5.2. It is fixed in 26.6.0.
- How severe is CVE-2026-49229? CVE-2026-49229 has a CVSS score of 8.3 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of @actual-app/sync-server are affected by CVE-2026-49229? @actual-app/sync-server (npm) versions <= 26.5.2 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-49229? Yes. CVE-2026-49229 is fixed in 26.6.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-49229 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-49229 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-49229 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-49229? Upgrade
@actual-app/sync-serverto 26.6.0 or later.