Summary
LangGraph: BaseCache Deserialization of Untrusted Data may lead to Remote Code Execution
Full technical description
Context
A Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from BaseCache and opt nodes into caching via CachePolicy. Prior to langgraph-checkpoint 4.0.0, BaseCache defaults to JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True). When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via pickle.loads(...).
Who is affected?
Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when:
- The application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing
cache=...toStateGraph.compile(...)or otherwise configuring aBaseCacheimplementation) - One or more nodes opt into caching via
CachePolicy - The attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file)
Example (enabling a cache backend and opting a node into caching):
from langgraph.cache.memory import InMemoryCache
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph
from langgraph.types import CachePolicy
def my_node(state: dict) -> dict:
return {"value": state.get("value", 0) + 1}
builder = StateGraph(dict)
builder.add_node("my_node", my_node, cache_policy=CachePolicy(ttl=120))
builder.set_entry_point("my_node")
graph = builder.compile(cache=InMemoryCache())
result = graph.invoke({"value": 1})
With pickle_fallback=True, when msgpack serialization fails, JsonPlusSerializer can fall back to storing values as a ("pickle", <bytes>) tuple and later deserialize them via pickle.loads(...). If an attacker can place a malicious pickle payload into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process reads and deserializes it, this can lead to arbitrary code execution.
Exploitation requires attacker write access to the cache backend. The serializer is not exposed as a network-facing API.
This is fixed in langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0 by disabling pickle fallback by default (pickle_fallback=False).
Root Cause
BaseCachedefault serializer configuration inherited by cache implementations (InMemoryCache,RedisCache,SqliteCache):libs/checkpoint/langgraph/cache/base/__init__.py(pre-fix default:JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True))
JsonPlusSerializerdeserialization sink:libs/checkpoint/langgraph/checkpoint/serde/jsonplus.pyloads_typed(...)callspickle.loads(data_)whentype_ == "pickle"and pickle fallback is enabled
Attack preconditions
An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them.
This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume).
Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector.
Resources
- ZDI-CAN-28385
- Patch: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677
- Patch diff: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677.patch
- Credit: Peter Girnus (@gothburz), Demeng Chen, and Brandon Niemczyk (Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative)
Impact
Arbitrary code execution in the LangGraph process when attacker-controlled cache entries are deserialized.
Untrusted serialized data is processed by a deserializer that can instantiate arbitrary objects or execute code as a side effect. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution or logic abuse.
CVE-2026-27794 has a CVSS score of 6.6 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, high privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.0.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
- Upgrade to
langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-27794? CVE-2026-27794 is a medium-severity insecure deserialization vulnerability in langgraph-checkpoint (pip), affecting versions < 4.0.0. It is fixed in 4.0.0. Untrusted serialized data is processed by a deserializer that can instantiate arbitrary objects or execute code as a side effect.
- How severe is CVE-2026-27794? CVE-2026-27794 has a CVSS score of 6.6 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of langgraph-checkpoint are affected by CVE-2026-27794? langgraph-checkpoint (pip) versions < 4.0.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-27794? Yes. CVE-2026-27794 is fixed in 4.0.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-27794 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-27794 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-27794 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-27794? Upgrade
langgraph-checkpointto 4.0.0 or later.